BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9588990)

  • 1. Preliminary evaluation of tin plating for extracoronal restorations: evaluation of marginal quality and retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 9588990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of die spacer on retention and fitting of complete cast crowns.
    Olivera AB; Saito T
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 16827737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of tin plating systems for a high-noble alloy.
    Imbery TA; Davis RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8507331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of two fit-indicating materials and various subsequent cleaning methods on the retention of simulated crowns.
    Hammad IA; Al Amri M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 18182185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
    Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of electric arc, gas oxygen torch and induction melting techniques on the marginal accuracy of cast base-metal and noble metal-ceramic crowns.
    Gómez-Cogolludo P; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):826-31. PubMed ID: 23810734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of surface configuration on the retention of posts designed for use with a cast-on technique.
    Rosin M; Fleissner P; Welk A; Steffen H; Heine B
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Feb; 32(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 12066672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory evaluation of a metal-priming agent for adhesive bonding.
    Barkmeier WW; Latta MA
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(10):749-52. PubMed ID: 11204003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of seating force, margin design, and cement on marginal seal and retention of complete metal crowns.
    Piemjai M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 12066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The significance of marginal gap and overextension measurement in the evaluation of the fit of complete crowns.
    Boeckler AF; Stadler A; Setz JM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):26-37. PubMed ID: 16299604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.