145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9589841)
21. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP): a perspective on potential clinical applications.
Matos C; Devière J; Nicaise N; Braudé P; Van Gansbeke D; Metens T; Struyven J; Cremer M
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 1997; 60(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 9529670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography.
Reinhold C; Bret PM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1285-95. PubMed ID: 8633434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
Mougenel JL; Hudziak H; Ernst O; Dupas B; Lefevre F; Barraud H; Watelet J; Cezard O; Regent D; Bigard MA
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Initial experience with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography].
Malíková H; Weichet J; Vymazal J; Balák J; Drugová B; Mares K; Oliverius M
Cas Lek Cesk; 2003; 142(11):656-60. PubMed ID: 14689824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Efficacy of multidirection MRCP].
Koike S; Honjo K; Yasui M; Matsunaga N
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2808-12. PubMed ID: 10049032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with 2D and 3D-FASE sequence at 0.5 tesla: evaluation based on measurements of signal intensity ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio].
Ichikawa T; Hanaoka H; Nitatori T; Hachiya J; Araki T
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2817-24. PubMed ID: 9847603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, potential indications, and diagnostic features of benign, postoperative, and malignant conditions.
Becker CD; Grossholz M; Mentha G; de Peyer R; Terrier F
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(6):865-74. PubMed ID: 9228102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fentanyl-augmented MRCP.
Agarwal S; Nag P; Sikora S; Prasad TL; Kumar S; Gupta RK
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 16465580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Magnetic resonance study of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Calderón A; Heras I; Durán M; Orive V; Cabriada J; Astigarraga E
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1999 Apr; 91(4):287-96. PubMed ID: 10348928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Value of selective MIP reconstructions in respiratory triggered 3D TSE MR-cholangiography on a workstation in comparison with MIP standard projections and single-shot MRCP].
Schaible R; Textor J; Kreft B; Neubrand M; Schild H
Rofo; 2001 May; 173(5):416-23. PubMed ID: 11414149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences.
Cova M; Stacul F; Cester G; Ukmar M; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2003 Sep; 106(3):178-90. PubMed ID: 14612839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation.
Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kamata N
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16680507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Pancreas divisum: Diagnostic importance of MR cholangiopancreatography].
Yağmurlu B; Erden A; Erden I
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Sep; 9(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 14661601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [MR cholangiopancreatography using respiratory triggered half-Fourier RARE technique].
Morimoto A; Nishio H; Shimoyashiki Y; Shiraishi J
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2859-64. PubMed ID: 9847610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients.
Onishi H; Kim T; Hori M; Murakami T; Tatsumi M; Nakaya Y; Nakamoto A; Osuga K; Tomoda K; Nakamura H
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):559-65. PubMed ID: 19692840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease.
Sahai AV; Devonshire D; Yeoh KG; Kay C; Feldman D; Willner I; Farber J; Patel R; Tamasky PR; Cunningham JT; Trus T; Hawes RH; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jul; 96(7):2074-80. PubMed ID: 11467634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Basic principles and historical consideration of MR cholangiopancreatography].
Ohgi K; Furukawa T; Akiyama H; Kimura S; Uehara K; Murata K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2755-9. PubMed ID: 9847594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of the biliary tract and gallbladder.
Watanabe Y; Dohke M; Ishimori T; Amoh Y; Okumura A; Oda K; Koike S; Dodo Y
Radiographics; 1999; 19(2):415-29. PubMed ID: 10194788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [MR-cholangiopancreatography using three-dimensional Fourier transfer fast asymmetric spin-echo method (3DFT-FASE)--clinical evaluation].
Yamakawa K; Satake H; Naganawa S; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2825-9. PubMed ID: 9847604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
