These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9590909)

  • 21. Surface treatment of mercury-free alloys.
    Geiger SB; Gurbatov D; Dariel MP; Eichmiller FC; Liberman R; Ratzker M
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10483447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the mechanical properties of a gallium-based alloy with a spherical high-copper amalgam.
    Shaini FJ; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2001 Mar; 17(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 11163384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Gallium: an alternative for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; Davidson CL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Apr; 104(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 11924385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Structure of dental gallium alloys.
    Herø H; Simensen CJ; Jørgensen RB
    Biomaterials; 1996 Jul; 17(13):1321-6. PubMed ID: 8805980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An in-vitro investigation of variables influencing mercury vapor release from dental amalgam.
    Neme AL; Maxson BB; Linger JB; Abbott LJ
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 11817472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gallium alloy restorations in primary teeth: a 12-month study.
    Kaga M; Nakajima H; Sakai T; Oguchi H
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1195-200. PubMed ID: 8803395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of inductively coupled plasma-emission spectroscopy and mercury vapor analyses to evaluate elemental release from a high-copper dental amalgam: a pilot study.
    Cohen BI; Penugonda B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):409-12. PubMed ID: 11319540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Criteria for choice of an alloy for dental amalgams].
    De Valkeneer I; Bercy P
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990 Jun; 44(170):219-36. PubMed ID: 2088017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy.
    Kiremitci A; Bolay S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 12787466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of different amalgams with different liners.
    Gallato A; Angnes G; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 15942619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [A comparative evaluation of the technological characteristics of working with metal-containing filling materials in the clinic].
    Iankevich OV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1997; 76(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 9471804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of dentin/amalgam alloy bonding agents: results after 1 year.
    Meiers JC; Turner EW
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9610330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Galvanic interaction between titanium and gallium alloy or dental amalgam.
    Horasawa N; Takahashi S; Marek M
    Dent Mater; 1999 Sep; 15(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 10863427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Liquid gallium alloys for metallic plastic fillings.
    Okamoto Y; Horibe T
    Br Dent J; 1991 Jan; 170(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 2001297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator.
    Yap AU; Ong LF; Teoh SH; Hastings GW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Mar; 26(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 10194732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time-dependent corrosion potential of newly-placed admixed dental amalgam restorations.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hall GC; Millar M
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 16901535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro corrosion behavior and microstructure examination of a gallium-based restorative.
    DeSchepper EJ; Oshida Y; Moore BK; Cook NB; Eggertson H
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):209-16. PubMed ID: 9484143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.