These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9590929)

  • 21. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Raj S; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Sep; 21(3):86-94. PubMed ID: 14703213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Shear bond strengths of two luting cements to laboratory-cured prosthetic resin composite.
    Yoshida K; Greener EH; Lautenschlager EP
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 8329155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.
    Duarte S; Botta AC; Meire M; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
    Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
    Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin.
    Yenisey M; Kulunk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 18182184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of storage and acid etching on the tensile bond strength of composite resins to glass ionomer cement.
    Mesquita MF; Domitti SS; Consani S; de Goes MF
    Braz Dent J; 1999; 10(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 10863383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An in vitro comparative evaluation of the tensile bond strength at the two interfaces of the sandwich technique.
    Rao V; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1995 Aug; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 9522732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Shear bond strengths of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials.
    Swift EJ; Pawlus MA; Vargas MA
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(4):138-43. PubMed ID: 8700781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the bond strength to enamel and dentin of two compomers: an in vitro study.
    Cortés O; García C; Pérez L; Bravo LA
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 9559082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro bond strengths of resin modified glass ionomer cements and composite resin self-cure adhesives: introduction of an adhesive system with increased bond strength and inhibition of decalcification.
    Newman RA; Newman GV; Sengupta A
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Aug; 71(4):312-7. PubMed ID: 11510641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Repairability of three resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials.
    Shaffer RA; Charlton DG; Hermesch CB
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(4):168-72. PubMed ID: 9760918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Initial tensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomers and polyacid-modified resins on perfused primary dentin.
    Kielbassa AM; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(3):183-7, 165. PubMed ID: 9262799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium:YAG laser.
    Trajtenberg CP; Pereira PN; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Oct; 17(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 15575443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The repair potential of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Maneenut C; Sakoolnamarka R; Tyas MJ
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jul; 26(7):659-65. PubMed ID: 20409575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Resin-modified glass ionomers: dentin bond strength versus time.
    Miyazaki M; Iwasaki K; Soyamura T; Onose H; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 9656926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite.
    Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 12473997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.