These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9590940)

  • 1. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses.
    Wennerberg A; Hallgren C; Johansson C; Danelli S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Feb; 9(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9590940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies.
    Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B; Krol JJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Mar; 6(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 7669864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone.
    Wennerberg A; Ektessabi A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 9274077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of c.p. titanium screws blasted with 25- and 75-microns-sized particles of Al2O3.
    Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Lausmaa J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Feb; 30(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 9019491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography.
    Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B
    Biomaterials; 1996 Jan; 17(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8962942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants.
    Han CH; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Feb; 9(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9590939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
    Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone.
    Sul YT; Kang BS; Johansson C; Um HS; Park CJ; Albrektsson T
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 18470920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone.
    Ivanoff CJ; Widmark G; Johansson C; Wennerberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 12814308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide.
    Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 8820121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Promotion of osseointegration of anodized titanium implants with a 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 submicron particle coating.
    Cho YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lee SJ; Lee JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 22167427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of nicotine administration on different implant surfaces: a histometric study in rabbits.
    Stefani CM; Nogueira F; Sallum EA; de TS; Sallum AW; Nociti FH
    J Periodontol; 2002 Feb; 73(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 11895287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo evaluation of cp Ti implants with modified surfaces by laser beam with and without hydroxyapatite chemical deposition and without and with thermal treatment: topographic characterization and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
    Queiroz TP; de Molon RS; Souza FÁ; Margonar R; Thomazini AH; Guastaldi AC; Hochuli-Vieira E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 27530186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysing the optimal value for titanium implant roughness in bone attachment using a tensile test.
    Rønold HJ; Lyngstadaas SP; Ellingsen JE
    Biomaterials; 2003 Nov; 24(25):4559-64. PubMed ID: 12950998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of surface texture for bone integration of screw shaped implants: an in vivo study of implants patterned by photolithography.
    Hallgren C; Reimers H; Gold J; Wennerberg A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 Dec; 57(4):485-96. PubMed ID: 11553878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histomorphometric and mechanical evaluation of the bone-tissue response to implants prepared with different orientation of surface topography.
    Hallgren C; Sawase T; Ortengren U; Wennerberg A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2001; 3(4):194-203. PubMed ID: 11887656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical and histomorphometric properties of four different mini-implant surfaces.
    Yadav S; Upadhyay M; Roberts WE
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 25681126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo.
    Rüger M; Gensior TJ; Herren C; von Walter M; Ocklenburg C; Marx R; Erli HJ
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2852-61. PubMed ID: 20080212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.