149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9591022)
1. European guidelines for quality assurance in the surgical management of mammographically detected lesions.
O'Higgins N; Linos DA; Blichert-Toft M; Cataliotti L; de Wolf C; Rochard F; Rutgers EJ; Roberts P; Mattheiem W; da Silva MA; Holmberg L; Schulz KD; Smola MG; Mansel RE
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1998 Apr; 24(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 9591022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. European guidelines for quality assurance in the surgical management of mammographically detected lesions. European Breast Cancer Working Group.
O'Higgins N; Linos DA; Blichert-Toft M; Cataliotti L; de Wolf C; Rochard F; Rutgers EJ; Roberts PJ; Mattheiem W; da Silva MA; Holmberg L; Schulz KD; Smola MG; Mansel RE
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1998; 87(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 9598249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The role of epidemiological quality parameters in a mammography screening programme].
Becker N
Radiologe; 2006 Nov; 46(11):984-92. PubMed ID: 16177930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Mammography screening. Concept, quality assurance and interdisciplinary cooperation].
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Nährig J; Hacker A
Pathologe; 2008 Nov; 29 Suppl 2():163-7. PubMed ID: 18807041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Quality assurance in roentgen mammography. Comparison of recommended EUREF guidelines with relevant German regulations].
Zaers J; van Woudenberg S; Brix G
Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 9411478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document.
Perry N; Broeders M; de Wolf C; Törnberg S; Holland R; von Karsa L
Ann Oncol; 2008 Apr; 19(4):614-22. PubMed ID: 18024988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Breast cancer screening: a current topic].
Gilles R; Dilhuydy M
J Radiol; 2001 Jun; 82(6 Pt 1):619-20. PubMed ID: 11449163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Guideline for the additional test positions according to the EPQC 4th Edition for Digital Mammography Systems].
Sommer A; Lenzen H; Blaser D; Ehlers SE; Schopphoven S; John C;
Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):845-50. PubMed ID: 19676011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Guidelines for pathology--supplement to European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. Report by the Pathology Working Group of the European Community].
Sloane JP; Amendoeira I; Apostolikas N; Bellocq JP; Bianchi S; Böcker W; Bussolati G; Connolly CE; De Miguel C; Dervan P; Drijkoningen R; Elston CW; Faverly D; Gad A; Holland R; Jacquemier J; Lacerda M; Lindgren A; Martinez-Peñuela J; Peterse JL; Rank F; Tsakraklides V; de Wolf C; Zafrani B
Pathologe; 1997 Jan; 18(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 9157408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance in mammography. Accreditation, legislation, and compliance with quality assurance standards.
Hendrick RE
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 1732931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mammography screening].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Becker N; Bock K; Anders K; Bautz W
Radiologe; 2007 Apr; 47(4):359-69; quiz 370. PubMed ID: 17375277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.
Klabunde C; Bouchard F; Taplin S; Scharpantgen A; Ballard-Barbash R;
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Mar; 55(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11160176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and implementation of guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening: the European experience.
von Karsa L; Arrossi S
Salud Publica Mex; 2013; 55(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 23912545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [European recommendations for quality assurance in the setting of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Report of pathologists of the working group "Breast Cancer Screening" of the European Union].
Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):315-33. PubMed ID: 9004719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer: when and how often to get screened. How do you make sense of conflicting mammography guidelines?
Harv Womens Health Watch; 2013 Oct; 21(2):3. PubMed ID: 24432454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.
Parikh J; Fanus D
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):854-60. PubMed ID: 17411717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of early performance indicators for screening projects within the European Breast Cancer Network: 1989-2000.
Broeders MJ; Scharpantgen A; Ascunce N; Gairard B; Olsen AH; Mantellini P; Mota TC; Van Limbergen E; Séradour B; Ponti A; Trejo LS; Nyström L;
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2005 Apr; 14(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 15785314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How do the latest breast cancer screening recommendations affect you?
Health After 50 Sci Am Consum Health; 2016 Feb; 27(15):4-5. PubMed ID: 27062757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality assured images in mammographic screening. Assessment criteria as a basis for national guidelines].
Ståhl M; Edström C
Lakartidningen; 2001 Mar; 98(10):1097-101. PubMed ID: 11301976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mammary lesions with special regard to the BI-RADS((R)) classification system in mammography].
Boehm T; Garzoli E; Marincek B
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2002; 42(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 12373023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
