BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9591186)

  • 1. Protocol design considerations that relate to demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of chemopreventive agents.
    Johnson KA; Beitz J; Justice R; Schmidt W; Andrews P; DeLap R
    J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1997; 27():1-6. PubMed ID: 9591186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cancer risk factors for selecting cohorts for large-scale chemoprevention trials.
    Greenwald P
    J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1996; 25():29-36. PubMed ID: 9027595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk biomarkers and current strategies for cancer chemoprevention.
    Kelloff GJ; Boone CW; Crowell JA; Nayfield SG; Hawk E; Malone WF; Steele VE; Lubet RA; Sigman CC
    J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1996; 25():1-14. PubMed ID: 9027592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surrogate endpoint biomarkers for phase II cancer chemoprevention trials.
    Kelloff GJ; Boone CW; Crowell JA; Steele VE; Lubet R; Doody LA
    J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1994; 19():1-9. PubMed ID: 7823579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of chemoprevention in cancer control.
    Greenwald P; Kelloff GJ
    IARC Sci Publ; 1996; (139):13-22. PubMed ID: 8923016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).
    Pergolizzi J; Böger RH; Budd K; Dahan A; Erdine S; Hans G; Kress HG; Langford R; Likar R; Raffa RB; Sacerdote P
    Pain Pract; 2008; 8(4):287-313. PubMed ID: 18503626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chemoprevention trials in the cervix: design, feasibility, and recruitment.
    Mitchell MF; Hittelman WN; Lotan R; Nishioka K; Tortolero-Luna G; Richards-Kortum R; Hong WK
    J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1995; 23():104-12. PubMed ID: 8747384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Summary of recommendations for colonic biomarker studies of candidate chemopreventive compounds in phase II clinical trials.
    Lipkin M
    J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1994; 19():94-8. PubMed ID: 7823612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A pilot study to establish a clinical model to perform phase II studies of breast cancer chemopreventive agents in women at high risk with biomarkers as surrogate endpoints for activity.
    Stearns V; Gallagher A; Kleer CG; Singh B; Freedman M; Haddad BR; Isaacs C; Warren R; Brown M; Cullen J; Trock B; Hayes DF
    Clin Cancer Res; 2004 Dec; 10(24):8332-40. PubMed ID: 15623610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anticancer Drug Development: The Way Forward.
    Connors T
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(3):180-181. PubMed ID: 10387985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Progress in clinical chemoprevention.
    Kelloff GJ; Hawk ET; Karp JE; Crowell JA; Boone CW; Steele VE; Lubet RA; Sigman CC
    Semin Oncol; 1997 Apr; 24(2):241-52. PubMed ID: 9129692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects].
    Tomioka H; Namba K
    Kekkaku; 2006 Dec; 81(12):753-74. PubMed ID: 17240921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspectives on surrogate end points in the development of drugs that reduce the risk of cancer.
    Kelloff GJ; Sigman CC; Johnson KM; Boone CW; Greenwald P; Crowell JA; Hawk ET; Doody LA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Feb; 9(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 10698472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Approaches to the development and marketing approval of drugs that prevent cancer.
    Kelloff GJ; Johnson JR; Crowell JA; Boone CW; DeGeorge JJ; Steele VE; Mehta MU; Temeck JW; Schmidt WJ; Burke G
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1995; 4(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 7894318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New science-based endpoints to accelerate oncology drug development.
    Kelloff GJ; Sigman CC
    Eur J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 41(4):491-501. PubMed ID: 15737552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surrogate end-point biomarkers in chemopreventive drug development.
    Kelloff GJ; Sigman CC; Hawk ET; Johnson KM; Crowell JA; Guyton KZ
    IARC Sci Publ; 2001; 154():13-26. PubMed ID: 11220652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review of oncology and hematology drug product approvals at the US Food and Drug Administration between July 2005 and December 2007.
    Sridhara R; Johnson JR; Justice R; Keegan P; Chakravarty A; Pazdur R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Feb; 102(4):230-43. PubMed ID: 20118413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The chemopreventive agent development research program in the Division of Cancer Prevention of the US National Cancer Institute: an overview.
    Crowell JA
    Eur J Cancer; 2005 Sep; 41(13):1889-910. PubMed ID: 16005206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Colorectal cancer prevention: is an ounce of prevention worth a pound of cure?
    Gill S; Sinicrope FA
    Semin Oncol; 2005 Feb; 32(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 15726503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.