These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9592054)

  • 1. Peri-threshold encoding of stimulus frequency and intensity in the M100 latency.
    Stufflebeam SM; Poeppel D; Rowley HA; Roberts TP
    Neuroreport; 1998 Jan; 9(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 9592054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency.
    Roberts TP; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1996 Apr; 7(6):1138-40. PubMed ID: 8817518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latency of evoked neuromagnetic M100 reflects perceptual and acoustic stimulus attributes.
    Roberts TP; Ferrari P; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1998 Oct; 9(14):3265-9. PubMed ID: 9831462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MEG detection of delayed auditory evoked responses in autism spectrum disorders: towards an imaging biomarker for autism.
    Roberts TP; Khan SY; Rey M; Monroe JF; Cannon K; Blaskey L; Woldoff S; Qasmieh S; Gandal M; Schmidt GL; Zarnow DM; Levy SE; Edgar JC
    Autism Res; 2010 Feb; 3(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 20063319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal resolution properties of human auditory cortex: reflections in the neuromagnetic auditory evoked M100 component.
    Gage N; Roberts TP; Hickok G
    Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 1069(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 16403467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal integration: reflections in the M100 of the auditory evoked field.
    Gage NM; Roberts TP
    Neuroreport; 2000 Aug; 11(12):2723-6. PubMed ID: 10976951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: stimulus dependence and insights toward perception.
    Roberts TP; Ferrari P; Stufflebeam SM; Poeppel D
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Mar; 17(2):114-29. PubMed ID: 10831104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The analysis of simple and complex auditory signals in human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic evidence from M100 modulation.
    Jenkins J; Idsardi WJ; Poeppel D
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):515-26. PubMed ID: 20445455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetoencephalography reveals altered auditory information processing in youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Korostenskaja M; Harris E; Giovanetti C; Horn P; Wang Y; Rose D; Fujiwara H; Xiang J
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 May; 212(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23545237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds.
    Gage N; Poeppel D; Roberts TP; Hickok G
    Brain Res; 1998 Dec; 814(1-2):236-9. PubMed ID: 9838140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulation-history effects on the M100 revealed by its differential dependence on the stimulus onset interval.
    Zacharias N; König R; Heil P
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Jul; 49(7):909-19. PubMed ID: 22469428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m and its dependence on stimulus duration.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 113(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 11897542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-induced asymmetry of the auditory evoked M100 neuromagnetic field elicited by speech sounds.
    Poeppel D; Yellin E; Phillips C; Roberts TP; Rowley HA; Wexler K; Marantz A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1996 Nov; 4(4):231-42. PubMed ID: 8957564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal encoding in auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields: stochastic resonance.
    Stufflebeam SM; Poeppel D; Roberts TP
    Neuroreport; 2000 Dec; 11(18):4081-5. PubMed ID: 11192632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing of vowels in supratemporal auditory cortex.
    Poeppel D; Phillips C; Yellin E; Rowley HA; Roberts TP; Marantz A
    Neurosci Lett; 1997 Jan; 221(2-3):145-8. PubMed ID: 9121685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linear coding of voice onset time.
    Frye RE; Fisher JM; Coty A; Zarella M; Liederman J; Halgren E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 19(9):1476-87. PubMed ID: 17714009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vowel categorization induces departure of M100 latency from acoustic prediction.
    Roberts TP; Flagg EJ; Gage NM
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jul; 15(10):1679-82. PubMed ID: 15232306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.