These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9592372)
1. NIH peer review: time for some changes. Nat Biotechnol; 1998 May; 16(5):395. PubMed ID: 9592372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients. Dove A Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Growing pains for NIH grant review. Bonetta L Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Research agenda. Opportunities for research and NIH. Collins FS Science; 2010 Jan; 327(5961):36-7. PubMed ID: 20044560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list. Kaiser J Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):758. PubMed ID: 14593135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes to NIH grant system may backfire. Karp PD; Sherlock G; Gerlt JA; Sim I; Paulsen I; Babbitt PC; Laderoute K; Hunter L; Sternberg P; Wooley J; Bourne PE Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5905):1187-8. PubMed ID: 19023064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review at NIH: a conversation with CSR director Toni Scarpa. Scarpa T Physiologist; 2010 Jun; 53(3):65, 67-9. PubMed ID: 20550006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NIH response to open letter. Fauci AS; Zerhouni EA Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5718):49. PubMed ID: 15802584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A metareview at the NIH. Nat Med; 2008 Apr; 14(4):351. PubMed ID: 18391922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review at National Institutes of Health: small steps forward. Johnston SC; Hauser SL Ann Neurol; 2008 Nov; 64(5):A15-7. PubMed ID: 19067350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]