These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9595621)

  • 1. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence by H. Brenner and O. Gefeller, Statistics in Medicine, 16, 981-991 (1997).
    Bender R; Lange S; Freitag G; Trampisch HJ
    Stat Med; 1998 Apr; 17(8):946-8. PubMed ID: 9595621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence.
    Brenner H; Gefeller O
    Stat Med; 1997 May; 16(9):981-91. PubMed ID: 9160493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical epistemology of sensitivity and specificity.
    Diamond GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1992 Jan; 45(1):9-13; discussion 15-6. PubMed ID: 1738017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic test performance.
    Torrance-Rynard VL; Walter SD
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2157-75. PubMed ID: 9330426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some issues in estimating the effect of prognostic factors from incomplete covariate data.
    Vach W
    Stat Med; 1997 Jan 15-Feb 15; 16(1-3):57-72. PubMed ID: 9004383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios.
    Biggerstaff BJ
    Stat Med; 2000 Mar; 19(5):649-63. PubMed ID: 10700737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of verification bias on positive and negative predictive values.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 1994 Sep; 13(17):1737-45. PubMed ID: 7997707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple statistical measures for diagnostic accuracy assessment.
    Mandrekar JN
    J Thorac Oncol; 2010 Jun; 5(6):763-4. PubMed ID: 20502268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis.
    Usher-Smith JA; Sharp SJ; Griffin SJ
    BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3139. PubMed ID: 27334281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regression modelling of diagnostic likelihood ratios for the evaluation of medical diagnostic tests.
    Leisenring W; Pepe MS
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):444-52. PubMed ID: 9629638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical prediction rules in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia demonstrate the usefulness of reporting likelihood ratios in infectious diseases.
    Bai AD; Showler A; Burry L; Steinberg M; Tomlinson GA; Bell CM; Morris AM
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1393-8. PubMed ID: 27357965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 1. Mathematical principles.
    Weissler AM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Nov; 74(11):1061-71. PubMed ID: 10560593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical utility of likelihood ratios.
    Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Mar; 31(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9506499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: "Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard".
    Andersen S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1997 Feb; 145(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 9012602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The misuse of predictive value--or why you must consider the odds.
    Gambino R
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 1809058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new likelihood approach to inference about predictive values of diagnostic tests in paired designs.
    Tsou TS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):541-548. PubMed ID: 27114327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity, predictive values, pretest-posttest probabilities, and likelihood ratios of presurgery clinical diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancers.
    Ermertcan AT; Oztürk F; Gençoğlan G; Eskiizmir G; Temiz P; Horasan GD
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Mar; 30(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 20950248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests.
    Einstein AJ; Bodian CA; Gil J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Feb; 121(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9126035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.