BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9596614)

  • 21. Anti-D immunoglobulin in RhD prophylaxis.
    Robson SC; Lee D; Urbaniak S
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Feb; 105(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 9501773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rh-immunoglobulin: Rh prophylaxis.
    Bowman J
    Best Pract Res Clin Haematol; 2006; 19(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16377539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. New recommendations must be explained to GPs and midwives.
    Everett C; Wray J
    BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7138):1165. PubMed ID: 9569419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The global burden of Rh disease.
    Zipursky A; Paul VK
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2011 Mar; 96(2):F84-5. PubMed ID: 21037283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Antenatal anti-Rh(D) antigen prophylaxis of Rh/-/- pregnancy in women on first consultation at the St. Sofia Obstetrics-Gynecology Hospital -- Sofia].
    Katsulov A; Iankov M; Zlateva K; Blagova A; Gogova K; Savova S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001; 40 Suppl 5():7-8. PubMed ID: 11785356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implementation of NICE recommendation for a policy of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis: a survey of UK maternity units.
    Harkness M; Freer Y; Prescott RJ; Warner P
    Transfus Med; 2008 Oct; 18(5):292-5. PubMed ID: 18937736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preventing Rhesus D haemolytic disease of the newborn by giving anti-D immunoglobulin: are the guidelines being adequately followed?
    Howard HL; Martlew VJ; McFadyen IR; Clarke CA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jan; 104(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 8988694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn: it is necessary to act].
    Mannessier L; Alie-Daram S; Roubinet F; Valat AS; Depoortère MH; Fournié A; Puech F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Sep; 29(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 11011272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The continuing struggle to eliminate hemolytic disease of the newborn from RH (D).
    Barlow JF
    S D J Med; 1999 Jan; 52(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 9926725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Antenatal suppression of Rh alloimmunization.
    Bowman JM
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 34(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 1651184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consensus Conference on Anti-D Prophylaxis. Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 8-9 April 1997. Papers and abstracts.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Nov; 105 Suppl 18():iv, 1-44. PubMed ID: 10328662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Costs and benefits of non-invasive fetal RhD determination.
    Teitelbaum L; Metcalfe A; Clarke G; Parboosingh JS; Wilson RD; Johnson JM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 25380024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Antenatal anti-Rh(D) antigen prophylaxis].
    Katsulov A;
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001; 40 Suppl 5():3-7. PubMed ID: 11785354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. Women should be counselled about source of anti-D immunoglobulin.
    Saha A
    BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7138):1165. PubMed ID: 9569418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The importance of antenatal immunoprophylaxis for prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn].
    Starcević M; Mataija M; Sović D; Dodig J; Matijević R; Kukuruzović M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2011 Mar; 65(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21568074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Adverse effects and patient information].
    Cortey A; Brossard Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S112-1S118. PubMed ID: 16495836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Controversies in Rh prophylaxis.
    Hensleigh PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Sep; 153(1):112-3. PubMed ID: 2994476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Rhesus prophylaxis--history and current status].
    Behrens O; Lellé RJ
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(5):204-10. PubMed ID: 9281253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The investigation of infants with RhD-negative mothers: can we safely omit the umbilical cord blood direct antiglobulin test?
    James RM; McGuire W; Smith DP
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2011 Jul; 96(4):F301-4. PubMed ID: 20659940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of Rh immune globulin: a review.
    Sutton GP; Jay A; Lim YS; Noland JE; Boral LI
    Indiana Med; 1988 Apr; 81(4):321-2. PubMed ID: 2834434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.