103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9599046)
1. Improvements needed in cervical screening in England.
Wise J
BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7140):1261. PubMed ID: 9599046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Smear tests were not on trial but should have been.
Anderson CM
BMJ; 1999 Apr; 318(7189):1007. PubMed ID: 10195979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Three women win in cancer screening case.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1999 Feb; 318(7182):484. PubMed ID: 10094532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Shadow over the screen.
Wilson M
Nurs Times; 1987 Oct 28-Nov 4; 83(43):19-20. PubMed ID: 3697164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative smears].
Vassilakos P; de Marval F; Muñoz M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1998 Jan; 118(1):97. PubMed ID: 9580199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
Weintraub D
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Soutter WP
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244-5; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Denton KJ
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Robertson J; Woodend B
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving Pap smears.
Loeb RA
Am Fam Physician; 1989 Dec; 40(6):48, 50. PubMed ID: 2589151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of re-screening of cervical smears in internal quality control.
Baker A; Melcher D; Smith R
J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 48(11):1002-4. PubMed ID: 8543619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audit shows weaknesses in cervical cancer screening.
Ferriman A
BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7295):1141. PubMed ID: 11348903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. PAPNET automated screening.
Whittaker J; Cruse P; Denny L; Dehaeck K; Soeters R; Duffield M; Bloch B; Wranz P; MacCallum S
S Afr Med J; 1996 Mar; 86(3):273-4. PubMed ID: 8658306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cytology screening and evaluation.
Noller KL
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 106(2):391-7. PubMed ID: 16055593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is proficiency testing in cervical cytology proficient?
Herbert A
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):536-7. PubMed ID: 9306928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
van Rijswijk A
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(8):399. PubMed ID: 10703599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effective cervical cytological sampling.
Slater D
Lancet; 1989 Aug; 2(8658):335. PubMed ID: 2569138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Are we ready for a paradigm change in cervical cancer screening?
Franco EL
Lancet; 2003 Dec; 362(9399):1866-7. PubMed ID: 14667737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cancer of the cervix--early detection--effective control.
Tomb J
J Med Liban; 1970; 23(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 5473315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
