These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9599151)

  • 41. Future of AIDS research office threatened.
    Appel A
    Nature; 1995 Jul; 376(6537):205-6. PubMed ID: 7617022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. NIH awards genome project grant to Baylor College of Medicine.
    Tex Med; 1991 Feb; 87(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 2031224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sequencing funds 'must remain focused'.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 Jan; 391(6663):114-5. PubMed ID: 9428751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Human Genome Project in retrospect.
    Abramowicz M
    Adv Genet; 2003; 50():231-61; discussion 507-10. PubMed ID: 14714693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. NIH grants: indirect costs under attacK again.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1984 Apr 12-18; 308(5960):578. PubMed ID: 6709066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Human Genome Project: two points of view.
    FASEB J; 1990 Aug; 4(11):2941-2. PubMed ID: 2379768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Energy labs link up genome efforts.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Oct; 383(6603):748. PubMed ID: 8892988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Overview of FY 2001 federal budget request.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):259. PubMed ID: 10700131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Project to sequence human genome moves on to the starting blocks.
    Nature; 1995 May; 375(6527):93-4. PubMed ID: 7753176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A high-stakes gamble on genome sequencing.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1999 Jun; 284(5422):1906-9. PubMed ID: 10400531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Overview of FY 2000 US federal budget request.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Mar; 17(3):219. PubMed ID: 10096278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Medicinal chemistry: GAO chides NIH.
    Walsh J
    Science; 1968 Aug; 161(3843):769. PubMed ID: 5663802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The authorization and appropriation process.
    Wilson MA
    Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1990; 26(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 2094510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Whatever happened to the genetic map?
    Roberts L
    Science; 1990 Jan; 247(4940):281-2. PubMed ID: 2296718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. After Katrina. New Orleans labs start their uncertain comeback.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5752):1267-9. PubMed ID: 16311313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Human genome project. The honeymoon is over.
    Anderson GC
    Nature; 1990 Jul; 346(6282):309. PubMed ID: 2374602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Genome sequencing. Insects rank low among genome priorities.
    Pennisi E
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1261-2. PubMed ID: 11701900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. US firm claims it can "sequence human genome in 3 years".
    Putman L
    Lancet; 1998 May; 351(9115):1566. PubMed ID: 10326553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Support for the Human Cancer Genome Project.
    Varmus H; Stillman B
    Science; 2005 Dec; 310(5754):1615. PubMed ID: 16339428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. NIH Institutes launch joint venture to map cancer genome.
    Vastag B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(3):162. PubMed ID: 16449675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.