These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9599151)

  • 81. U.S. seeks patent on genetic codes, setting off furor.
    Andrews EL
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Cost analysis and consequences of the National Cancer Plan.
    Pekar PP
    Fed Proc; 1974 Nov; 33(11):2225-30. PubMed ID: 4430379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. An express route to the genome?
    Beardsley T
    Sci Am; 1998 Aug; 279(2):30-2. PubMed ID: 9705700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. A meeting of the minds on the genome project?
    Roberts L
    Science; 1990 Nov; 250(4982):756-7. PubMed ID: 2237425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. The genome in the political rough.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1990 Aug; 336(8712):428-9. PubMed ID: 11642856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Genome projects ready to go.
    Lewin R
    Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):602-4. PubMed ID: 3363347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. 'Playing chicken' over gene markers.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 Dec; 278(5346):2046-8. PubMed ID: 9432713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Genome backlash going full force.
    Roberts L
    Science; 1990 May; 248(4957):804. PubMed ID: 11642769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Wall Street remains bearish on value of genome project.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jul; 358(6383):180. PubMed ID: 1630479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. The genetic map is back on track after delays.
    Roberts L
    Science; 1990 May; 248(4957):805. PubMed ID: 11659233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Human genome project. Tit for tat on patents?
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1991 Oct; 353(6347):785. PubMed ID: 1944543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Stanford erupts over indirect costs.
    Barinaga M
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):292-4. PubMed ID: 2326639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Preview of 1994 US budget emphasizes big projects.
    Mervis J; Reichhardt T
    Nature; 1993 Feb; 361(6414):670. PubMed ID: 8441450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Views of the genome project.
    Science; 1991 Feb; 251(4996):854-5. PubMed ID: 2000485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Watson versus Japan.
    Roberts L
    Science; 1989 Nov; 246(4930):576, 578. PubMed ID: 2814484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. The human genome initiative: a statement of need.
    Watson JD
    Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1991 Oct; 26(10):69-73. PubMed ID: 1918207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Hubris and the human genome.
    Marshall E; Pennisi E
    Science; 1998 May; 280(5366):994-5. PubMed ID: 9616087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. The Human Genome Program at the National Institutes of Health.
    Watson JD; Jordan E
    Genomics; 1989 Oct; 5(3):654-6. PubMed ID: 2613247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. The ideology of the human genome project.
    Tauber AI; Sarkar S
    J R Soc Med; 1993 Sep; 86(9):537-40. PubMed ID: 8410895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. The Human Genome Project: reaching the finish line.
    Waterston R; Sulston JE
    Science; 1998 Oct; 282(5386):53-4. PubMed ID: 9786797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.