These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9599396)

  • 1. Reproduction of radiologic images on plain paper.
    Ibbott GS; Zhang Y; Mohiuddin M; Adams E
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):755-60. PubMed ID: 9599396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The gray-scale ink-jet printer: value in making hard copies of digital images.
    Combs MJ; Snell J; Cail WS; Maier T; Buck DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):225-7. PubMed ID: 7998544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Lyttkens K; Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Andersson B; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Jarlman O; Lindberg CG; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 8075185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Image quality of paper prints compared to film copies in CT investigations].
    Bley T; Burger D; Ghanem N; Thürl C; Saueressig U; Kotter E; Langer M
    Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):423-5. PubMed ID: 11960403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-cost printing of computerised tomography (CT) images where there is no dedicated CT camera.
    Tabari AM
    J Telemed Telecare; 2007; 13(6):274-6. PubMed ID: 17785022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Demonstration of digital radiographs by means of ink jet-printed paper copies: pilot study.
    Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Nilsson J; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Nov; 5(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 1457540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experiences with computed radiography: can we afford the cost?
    Bragg DG; Murray KA; Tripp D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 9308439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Printed radiographs--is what you see what you get?
    Gerrard G
    Dent Update; 2013 Oct; 40(8):637-8, 641. PubMed ID: 24279216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The film-based printout using Tetenal Printing Solution II.
    Geissler O; Rother U
    Int J Comput Dent; 2007 Jul; 10(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 18271500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a high quality film duplication system using a laser digitizer: comparison with computed radiography.
    Yoshimura H; Xu XW; Doi K; MacMahon H; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Montner SM
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 8455513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel method for producing x-ray test objects and phantoms.
    Theodorakou C; Horrocks JA; Marshall NW; Speller RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):1423-38. PubMed ID: 15152683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, part I].
    Krug B; Böttge M; Coburger S; Reineke T; Zähringer M; V Smekal U; Winnekendonk G; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 12525980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Good B; Rockette H; Cooperstein LA; Feist JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Glasser D
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):481-5. PubMed ID: 9577498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a digital duplication system for portable chest radiographs.
    Hoffmann KR; Doi K; MacMahon H; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM; Xu XW; Yao L; Kano A; Carlin M
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Aug; 7(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 7948174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Pauwels H; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2004 Mar; 8(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 14652733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analog image recording using a laser printer and paper system.
    Cox GG; Johnson JA; Templeton AW; Preston DF; Lee KR; Nelson DL; Hensley KS; Dwyer SJ
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):1003-7. PubMed ID: 3908385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.