These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9599632)

  • 41. [Methodological approach to countermeasure options in rural settlements in the long terms after the accident at the Chernobyl NPP].
    Fesenko SV; Panov AV; Aleksakhin RM
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2001; 41(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 11605244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Methodology and tools for source term assessment in case of emergency.
    Herviou K; Calmtorp C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):53-7. PubMed ID: 15238656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Experiences in methods to involve key players in planning protective actions in the case of a nuclear accident.
    Sinkko K; Hämäläinen RP; Hänninen R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15238670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Evaluation of the effectiveness of protective measures for reduction of the rural population exposure related to contamination of forest ecosystems].
    Firsakova SK; Zhuchenko IuM; Fesenko SV; Kuchma ND; Dvornik AM
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2002; 42(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 12004621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Aerial contamination of agroecosystems following the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear plant].
    Sanzharova NI; Fesenko SV; Nedbaevskaia NA; Aleksakhin RM
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2001; 41(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 11605243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Experience and the results of emergency management of the 1957 accident at the Mayak Production Association.
    Batorshin GS; Mokrov YG
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):R1-R12. PubMed ID: 29176073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment and evaluation of the radiological situation in the late phase of a nuclear accident.
    Gering F; Weiss W; Wirth E; Stapel R; Jacob P; Müller H; Pröhl G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):25-9. PubMed ID: 15238651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. International exchange of emergency phase information and assessments: an aid to national/international decision makers.
    Sullivan TJ; Chino M; Ehrhardt J; Shershakov V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):133-6. PubMed ID: 15238671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A decision-support system for off-site nuclear emergencies.
    Yihua X; Lin G; Su P; Tiefu L; Honghui X; Yongxing Z; Xinzeng S
    Health Phys; 1998 Mar; 74(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 9482605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Chernobyl radionuclide distribution, migration, and environmental and agricultural impacts.
    Alexakhin RM; Sanzharova NI; Fesenko SV; Spiridonov SI; Panov AV
    Health Phys; 2007 Nov; 93(5):418-26. PubMed ID: 18049218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Response in the late phase to a radiological emergency.
    Morrey M; Nisbet A; Thome D; Savkin M; Hoe S; Brynildsen L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15238663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Organization of the nuclear emergency plan].
    Van Bladel L; Vandecasteele C
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):337-40. PubMed ID: 16408829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Finnish stakeholder engagement in the restoration of a radioactively contaminated food supply chain.
    Rantavaara A; Wallin H; Hasunen K; Härmälä K; Kulmala H; Latvio E; Liskola K; Mustonen I; Nieminen I; Tainio R
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 15905000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Environmental risk in energy production: experimental results, calculations and reflections after Chernobyl].
    Belli M; Bertocchi A; Campos Venuti G; Frullani S; Garibaldi F; Girolami B; Grandolfo M; Grisanti G; Mazzei F; Onori S
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1987; 23(2):177-522. PubMed ID: 3605922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The ecological relevance of current approaches for environmental protection from exposure to ionising radiation.
    Copplestone D; Howard BJ; Bréchignac F
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 74(1-3):31-41. PubMed ID: 15063534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Decision making framework for application of forest countermeasures in the long term after the Chernobyl accident.
    Fesenko SV; Voigt G; Spiridonov SI; Gontarenko IA
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 82(2):143-66. PubMed ID: 15878415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [The radioecological situation in the agricultural sphere in the contaminated regions of russia during the long-term after the Chernobyl accident].
    Panov AV; Fesenko SV; Aleksakhin RM; Pasternak AD; Prudnikov PV; Sanzharova NI; Goriainov VA; Novikov AA; Muzalevskaia AA
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2007; 47(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 17953429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Role of modelling in monitoring soil and food during different stages of a nuclear emergency.
    Sweeck L; Camps J; Mikailova R; Almahayni T
    J Environ Radioact; 2020 Dec; 225():106444. PubMed ID: 33120028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [On the problem of biodiagnostics under conditions of radioactive contamination].
    Tsvetnova OB; Shcheglov AI; Stolbova VV
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2014; 54(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 25775831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Regional long-term co-operation in the field of nuclear and radiation emergency preparedness.
    Sladek V; Metke E; Janko K; Hohenberg JK; Hofer P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):69-74. PubMed ID: 15238659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.