These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 959967)
1. The mechanism of capillarity in surgical dressings. Noe JM; Kalish S Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Sep; 143(3):454-6. PubMed ID: 959967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial. Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate methods of postoperative care of hypospadias. McLorie G; Joyner B; Herz D; McCallum J; Bagli D; Merguerian P; Khoury A J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1669-72. PubMed ID: 11342952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings. Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occlusive dressing versus petroleum gauze on drainage wounds. Alsbjörn BF; Ovesen H; Walther-Larsen S Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Mar; 156(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 2336914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. General and plastic surgery devices; classification of the nonresorbable gauze/sponge for external use, the hydrophilic wound dressing, the occlusive wound dressing, and the hydrogel wound dressing. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1999 Oct; 64(192):53927-9. PubMed ID: 11010701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of semiocclusive, transparent film dressings for surgical wound protection: experience in 3637 cases. Rubio PA Int Surg; 1991; 76(4):253-4. PubMed ID: 1778724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wound care. Selecting the right dressing. Erwin-Toth P; Hocevar BJ Am J Nurs; 1995 Feb; 95(2):46-51. PubMed ID: 7847504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of an absorbent silver-eluting dressing system on lower extremity revascularization wound complications. Childress BB; Berceli SA; Nelson PR; Lee WA; Ozaki CK Ann Vasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 21(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 17521872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wound dressings of the nineties: indications and contraindications. Jeter KF; Tintle TE Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 1991 Oct; 8(4):799-816. PubMed ID: 1682027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations. Holm C; Petersen JS; Grønboek F; Gottrup F Eur J Surg; 1998 Mar; 164(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 9562277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wound care. No. 11. Which dressing and why - 1. Westaby S Nurs Times; 1982 Jul 21-27; 78(29):suppl 41-4. PubMed ID: 6921654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The postoperative environment of the amputation stump. Postoperative wound dressing after through-knee amputation. Murdoch G Prosthet Orthot Int; 1983 Aug; 7(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 6622237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occlusive versus semi-open dressings in the management of skin graft donor sites. Demetriades D; Psaras G S Afr J Surg; 1992 Jun; 30(2):40-1. PubMed ID: 1519121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative evaluation of the dressing- and dressing-free methods of managing postoperative wounds in children]. Bushmelev VA; Abramov LA Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1987 Aug; (8):108-11. PubMed ID: 3682628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]