These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9599698)

  • 1. Acute oral toxicity.
    Walum E
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Apr; 106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):497-503. PubMed ID: 9599698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refinement and reduction of acute oral toxicity testing: a critical review of the use of cytotoxicity data.
    Schrage A; Hempel K; Schulz M; Kolle SN; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2011 Jul; 39(3):273-95. PubMed ID: 21777041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The biometric evaluation of the acute-toxic-class method (oral).
    Diener W; Siccha L; Mischke U; Kayser D; Schlede E
    Arch Toxicol; 1994; 68(10):599-610. PubMed ID: 7857199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the up-and-down method and the fixed-dose procedure for acute oral toxicity testing.
    Yam J; Reer PJ; Bruce RD
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 2040488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Registry of Cytotoxicity: toxicity testing in cell cultures to predict acute toxicity (LD50) and to reduce testing in animals.
    Halle W
    Altern Lab Anim; 2003; 31(2):89-198. PubMed ID: 15612878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alternative methods for the median lethal dose (LD(50)) test: the up-and-down procedure for acute oral toxicity.
    Rispin A; Farrar D; Margosches E; Gupta K; Stitzel K; Carr G; Greene M; Meyer W; McCall D
    ILAR J; 2002; 43(4):233-43. PubMed ID: 12391399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dermal acute toxic class method: test procedures and biometric evaluations.
    Diener W; Kayser D; Schlede E
    Arch Toxicol; 1998 Dec; 72(12):751-62. PubMed ID: 9950071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A national validation study of the acute-toxic-class method--an alternative to the LD50 test.
    Schlede E; Mischke U; Roll R; Kayser D
    Arch Toxicol; 1992; 66(7):455-70. PubMed ID: 1444812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of selected in vitro and in silico methods to predict acute oral toxicity in a regulatory context: results from the European Project ACuteTox.
    Prieto P; Kinsner-Ovaskainen A; Stanzel S; Albella B; Artursson P; Campillo N; Cecchelli R; Cerrato L; Díaz L; Di Consiglio E; Guerra A; Gombau L; Herrera G; Honegger P; Landry C; O'Connor JE; Páez JA; Quintas G; Svensson R; Turco L; Zurich MG; Zurbano MJ; Kopp-Schneider A
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Jun; 27(4):1357-76. PubMed ID: 22922246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of acute oral toxicity using the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) from the 28 day repeated dose toxicity studies in rats.
    Bulgheroni A; Kinsner-Ovaskainen A; Hoffmann S; Hartung T; Prieto P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 18977273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An up-and-down procedure for acute toxicity testing.
    Bruce RD
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 5(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 3987991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of five methods for the determination of lethal dose in acute toxicity studies.
    Paumgartten FJ; Presgrave OA; Menezes MA; Fingola FF; Freitas JC; Carvalho RR; Cunha FQ
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 1989; 22(8):987-91. PubMed ID: 2633852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The integrated acute systemic toxicity project (ACuteTox) for the optimisation and validation of alternative in vitro tests.
    Clemedson C; Kolman A; Forsby A
    Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Mar; 35(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 17411349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fixed-dose procedure and the acute-toxic-class method: a mathematical comparison.
    Stallard N; Whitehead A
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1995 Dec; 14(12):974-90. PubMed ID: 8962748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dermal and inhalation acute toxic class methods: test procedures and biometric evaluations for the Globally Harmonized Classification System.
    Holzhütter HG; Genschow E; Diener W; Schlede E
    Arch Toxicol; 2003 May; 77(5):243-54. PubMed ID: 12734637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extensive review of fish embryo acute toxicities for the prediction of GHS acute systemic toxicity categories.
    Scholz S; Ortmann J; Klüver N; Léonard M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):572-9. PubMed ID: 24929227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the up-and-down, conventional LD50, and fixed-dose acute toxicity procedures.
    Lipnick RL; Cotruvo JA; Hill RN; Bruce RD; Stitzel KA; Walker AP; Chu I; Goddard M; Segal L; Springer JA
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1995 Mar; 33(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 7896233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity Using a Multifingerprint Similarity Approach.
    Alberga D; Trisciuzzi D; Mansouri K; Mangiatordi GF; Nicolotti O
    Toxicol Sci; 2019 Feb; 167(2):484-495. PubMed ID: 30371864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The international validation of a fixed-dose procedure as an alternative to the classical LD50 test.
    van den Heuvel MJ; Clark DG; Fielder RJ; Koundakjian PP; Oliver GJ; Pelling D; Tomlinson NJ; Walker AP
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):469-82. PubMed ID: 2210519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.