91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9600822)
1. Using a logistic model to predict malignancy of adnexal masses based on menopausal status, ultrasound morphology, and color Doppler findings.
Alcázar JL; Jurado M
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 May; 69(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 9600822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models.
Marret H; Ecochard R; Giraudeau B; Golfier F; Raudrant D; Lansac J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 12493050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; López-García G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective evaluation of a logistic model based on sonographic morphologic and color Doppler findings developed to predict adnexal malignancy.
Alcázar JL; Jurado M
J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Dec; 18(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10591449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone.
Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Hugol D; Hassen K; Sciot C; Truc JB; Poitout P; Vadrot D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8553953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Froyman W; Wynants L; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FPG; Rossi A; Landolfo C; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):424-437. PubMed ID: 26800772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A model for malignancy probability prediction of adnexal masses.
Sutantawibul A; Ruangvutilert P; Sunsaneevithayakul P; Boriboonhirunsarn D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Aug; 86(8):742-9. PubMed ID: 12948273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flow characteristics in benign and malignant gynecologic tumors using transvaginal color flow Doppler.
Carter J; Saltzman A; Hartenbach E; Fowler J; Carson L; Twiggs LB
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 8272293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses with transvaginal sonography, color flow imaging, and serum CA 125 assay in pre- and postmenopausal women.
Strigini FA; Gadducci A; Del Bravo B; Ferdeghini M; Genazzani AR
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Apr; 61(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 8626120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sonoangiography and logistic regression analysis in the preoperative differentiation of ovarian tumors].
Smoleń A; Czekierdowski A; Daniłoś J; Kraczkowski J
Ginekol Pol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1053-60. PubMed ID: 12722399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Usefulness of color Doppler in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses].
Caruso A; Caforio L; Testa AC; Ciampelli M; Benedetti Panici P; Caruana P; Marana R; Mancuso S
Minerva Ginecol; 1998; 50(7-8):285-90. PubMed ID: 9808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 'pattern recognition' and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation.
Valentin L; Hagen B; Tingulstad S; Eik-Nes S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 18(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 11778996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Doppler with two-dimensional sonography and CA 125 for prediction of malignancy of pelvic masses.
Schneider VL; Schneider A; Reed KL; Hatch KD
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):983-8. PubMed ID: 8497367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pelvic examination, tumor marker level, and gray-scale and Doppler sonography in the prediction of pelvic cancer.
Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Groshen S; Morrow CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 9083301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings.
Jain KA
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8134599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Characteristics of ovarian tumors with color Doppler sonography: a comparison of predictive models derived from two academic centers data].
Smoleń A; Szpurek D; Czekierdowski A; Moszyński R
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):863-71. PubMed ID: 14674137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography in adnexal masses: which parameter performs best?
Alcázar JL; Ruiz-Perez ML; Errasti T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 8(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 8883314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
