These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9600822)
1. Using a logistic model to predict malignancy of adnexal masses based on menopausal status, ultrasound morphology, and color Doppler findings. Alcázar JL; Jurado M Gynecol Oncol; 1998 May; 69(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 9600822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models. Marret H; Ecochard R; Giraudeau B; Golfier F; Raudrant D; Lansac J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 12493050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses. Alcázar JL; López-García G Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective evaluation of a logistic model based on sonographic morphologic and color Doppler findings developed to predict adnexal malignancy. Alcázar JL; Jurado M J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Dec; 18(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10591449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography. Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone. Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Hugol D; Hassen K; Sciot C; Truc JB; Poitout P; Vadrot D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8553953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group. Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Froyman W; Wynants L; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FPG; Rossi A; Landolfo C; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):424-437. PubMed ID: 26800772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A model for malignancy probability prediction of adnexal masses. Sutantawibul A; Ruangvutilert P; Sunsaneevithayakul P; Boriboonhirunsarn D J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Aug; 86(8):742-9. PubMed ID: 12948273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flow characteristics in benign and malignant gynecologic tumors using transvaginal color flow Doppler. Carter J; Saltzman A; Hartenbach E; Fowler J; Carson L; Twiggs LB Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 8272293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses with transvaginal sonography, color flow imaging, and serum CA 125 assay in pre- and postmenopausal women. Strigini FA; Gadducci A; Del Bravo B; Ferdeghini M; Genazzani AR Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Apr; 61(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 8626120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sonoangiography and logistic regression analysis in the preoperative differentiation of ovarian tumors]. Smoleń A; Czekierdowski A; Daniłoś J; Kraczkowski J Ginekol Pol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1053-60. PubMed ID: 12722399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Usefulness of color Doppler in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses]. Caruso A; Caforio L; Testa AC; Ciampelli M; Benedetti Panici P; Caruana P; Marana R; Mancuso S Minerva Ginecol; 1998; 50(7-8):285-90. PubMed ID: 9808950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease. Salem S; White LM; Lai J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 'pattern recognition' and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation. Valentin L; Hagen B; Tingulstad S; Eik-Nes S Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 18(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 11778996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Doppler with two-dimensional sonography and CA 125 for prediction of malignancy of pelvic masses. Schneider VL; Schneider A; Reed KL; Hatch KD Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):983-8. PubMed ID: 8497367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pelvic examination, tumor marker level, and gray-scale and Doppler sonography in the prediction of pelvic cancer. Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Groshen S; Morrow CP Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 9083301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings. Jain KA Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8134599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Characteristics of ovarian tumors with color Doppler sonography: a comparison of predictive models derived from two academic centers data]. Smoleń A; Szpurek D; Czekierdowski A; Moszyński R Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):863-71. PubMed ID: 14674137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography in adnexal masses: which parameter performs best? Alcázar JL; Ruiz-Perez ML; Errasti T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 8(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 8883314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]