These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009]. Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Surveys on mammography frequency in Geneva. Lutz JM; Reith-Chaton J; Fioretta G; Cerny V; Bouchardy C J Med Screen; 2000; 7(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 11002453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [The attendance of the first screening round (2002-2003) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program and its effect on the number of diagnostic and screening mammography]. Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Csaba D; Budai A; Ember I Orv Hetil; 2005 Sep; 146(38):1963-70. PubMed ID: 16238249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French Health, Health Care and Insurance Survey. Duport N Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Dec; 60(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 23146369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program. Palència L; Espelt A; Rodríguez-Sanz M; Puigpinós R; Pons-Vigués M; Pasarín MI; Spadea T; Kunst AE; Borrell C Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):757-65. PubMed ID: 20176587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Contextual factors associated with uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening: A systematic review of the literature. Plourde N; Brown HK; Vigod S; Cobigo V Women Health; 2016; 56(8):906-25. PubMed ID: 26812962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Mammography and Pap test screening among low-income foreign-born Hispanic women in USA. Fernández MA; Tortolero-Luna G; Gold RS Cad Saude Publica; 1998; 14 Suppl 3():133-47. PubMed ID: 9819472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. A nurse-delivered intervention to reduce barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening in Chicago inner city clinics. Ansell D; Lacey L; Whitman S; Chen E; Phillips C Public Health Rep; 1994; 109(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 8303003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of prevention for cervical cancer and breast cancer among medical students. Rodríguez-Feria P; Hernández-Flórez LJ; Rodríguez-Feria D Rev Salud Publica (Bogota); 2016 Jun; 18(3):354-366. PubMed ID: 28453099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Introduction. The diffusion of screening programmes in Italy: 2007. Zappa M; Naldoni C; Paci E; Segnan N; Vettorazzi C; Federici A Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(3 Suppl 2):7-10. PubMed ID: 19776483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women. Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Screening for breast and cervical cancer in a large German city: participation, motivation and knowledge of risk factors. Klug SJ; Hetzer M; Blettner M Eur J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 15(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 15788807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Cognitive and affective correlates of decisional balance regarding screening mammography in older women. Phillips CA; Green HJ; Morrissey SA Psychol Health Med; 2012; 17(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 21780961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Cervical and breast cancer screening participation for women with chronic conditions in France: results from a national health survey. Constantinou P; Dray-Spira R; Menvielle G BMC Cancer; 2016 Mar; 16():255. PubMed ID: 27029643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Effect on attendance at breast cancer screening of adding a self administered questionnaire to the usual invitation to breast screening in southern England. Banks E; Richardson A; Beral V; Crossley B; Simmonds M; Hilton E; English R; Davis J; Austoker J J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 Feb; 52(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 9578859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicians' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efforts. Zapka JG; Puleo E; Taplin S; Solberg LI; Mouchawar J; Somkin C; Geiger AM; Ulcickas Yood M J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):46-54. PubMed ID: 16287885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. A nurse practitioner intervention to increase breast and cervical cancer screening for poor, elderly black women. The Harlem Study Team. Mandelblatt J; Traxler M; Lakin P; Thomas L; Chauhan P; Matseoane S; Kanetsky P J Gen Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 8(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 8515326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Breast and cervical cancer screening attendance among Czech women. Altová A; Kulhánová I; Brůha L; Lustigová M Cent Eur J Public Health; 2021 Jun; 29(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 34245547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Cancer screening rates. Samuelson P J Am Board Fam Pract; 2000; 13(6):468-9. PubMed ID: 11117349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]