These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9601658)

  • 21. Interstimulus interval and the selective-attention effect on auditory ERPs: "N1 enhancement" versus processing negativity.
    Teder W; Alho K; Reinikainen K; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Jan; 30(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 8416064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Further evidence that congenitally blind participants react faster to auditory and tactile spatial targets.
    Collignon O; De Volder AG
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 20025387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modulation of mismatch negativity by stimulus deviance and modality of attention.
    Müller BW; Achenbach C; Oades RD; Bender S; Schall U
    Neuroreport; 2002 Jul; 13(10):1317-20. PubMed ID: 12151795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Low dose of ethanol suppresses mismatch negativity of auditory event-related potentials.
    Jääskeläinen IP; Lehtokoski A; Alho K; Kujala T; Pekkonen E; Sinclair JD; Näätänen R; Sillanaukee P
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1995 Jun; 19(3):607-10. PubMed ID: 7573781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrophysiological evidence for cross-modal plasticity in humans with early- and late-onset blindness.
    Kujala T; Alho K; Huotilainen M; Ilmoniemi RJ; Lehtokoski A; Leinonen A; Rinne T; Salonen O; Sinkkonen J; Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 1997 Mar; 34(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 9090272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neural plasticity of voice processing: Evidence from event-related potentials in late-onset blind and sighted individuals.
    Föcker J; Hölig C; Best A; Röder B
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2015; 33(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 25374347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Middle latency auditory evoked potentials in congenitally blind and normal sighted subjects.
    Naveen KV; Srinivas RS; Nirmala KS; Nagendra HR; Telles S
    Int J Neurosci; 1997 Jun; 90(1-2):105-11. PubMed ID: 9285292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shifts of attention in the early blind: an erp study of attentional control processes in the absence of visual spatial information.
    Van Velzen J; Eardley AF; Forster B; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2533-46. PubMed ID: 16687156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The fusion of unattended duration representations as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Pfingst KA; McKenzie DN
    Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1435():118-29. PubMed ID: 22197031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differences between congenitally blind and normally sighted subjects in the P1 component of middle latency auditory evoked potentials.
    Naveen KV; Srinivas R; Nirmala KS; Nagarathna R; Nagendra HR; Telles S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1192-4. PubMed ID: 9700792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preparatory activity in occipital cortex in early blind humans predicts auditory perceptual performance.
    Stevens AA; Snodgrass M; Schwartz D; Weaver K
    J Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 27(40):10734-41. PubMed ID: 17913907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An event-related potential study of selective auditory attention in children and adults.
    Coch D; Sanders LD; Neville HJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 17(4):605-22. PubMed ID: 15829081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mental training enhances attentional stability: neural and behavioral evidence.
    Lutz A; Slagter HA; Rawlings NB; Francis AD; Greischar LL; Davidson RJ
    J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 29(42):13418-27. PubMed ID: 19846729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Alteration of Duration Mismatch Negativity Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Left Parietal Lobe.
    Oshima H; Shiga T; Niwa SI; Enomoto H; Ugawa Y; Yabe H
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 48(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 26873935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Employing an active mental task to enhance the performance of auditory attention-based brain-computer interfaces.
    Xu H; Zhang D; Ouyang M; Hong B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jan; 124(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 22854211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automatic and effortful processes in auditory memory reflected by event-related potentials. Age-related findings.
    Amenedo E; Díaz F
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 108(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 9714378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direct evidence for differential roles of temporal and frontal components of auditory change detection.
    Shalgi S; Deouell LY
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1878-88. PubMed ID: 17239410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind.
    Ptito M; Moesgaard SM; Gjedde A; Kupers R
    Brain; 2005 Mar; 128(Pt 3):606-14. PubMed ID: 15634727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.