105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9602550)
1. Inter-laboratory comparison of air particulate monitoring data.
Nejedlý Z; Campbell JL; Teesdale WJ; Dlouhy JF; Dann TF; Hoff RM; Brook JR; Wiebe HA
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1998 May; 48(5):386-97. PubMed ID: 9602550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Portable XRF analysis of occupational air filter samples from different workplaces using different samplers: final results, summary and conclusions.
Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Bartley DL; Slaven JE; Andrew ME
J Environ Monit; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1263-70. PubMed ID: 17968454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis of air filter samples from a scrap lead smelting operation.
Harper M; Hallmark TS; Andrew ME; Bird AJ
J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):819-26. PubMed ID: 15480496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a bronze foundry.
Harper M; Pacolay B; Andrew ME
J Environ Monit; 2005 Jun; 7(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 15931420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
Stanier CO; Lee SR;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a secondary lead smelter/solder manufacturer.
Harper M; Pacolay B
J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 16395471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Origins of PM10 determined by the micro-proton induced X-ray emission spectra of single aerosol particles.
Yue W; Li X; Wan T; Liu J; Zhang G; Li Y
Appl Spectrosc; 2006 Jun; 60(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 16808872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of an interlaboratory comparison of analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars and biosugars in atmospheric aerosol.
Chiara Pietrogrande M; Barbaro E; Bove MC; Clauser G; Colombi C; Corbella L; Cuccia E; Dalla Torre S; Decesari S; Fermo P; Gambaro A; Gianelle V; Ielpo P; Larcher R; Lazzeri P; Massabò D; Melchionna G; Nardin T; Paglione M; Perrino C; Prati P; Visentin M; Zanca N; Zangrando R
Chemosphere; 2017 Oct; 184():269-277. PubMed ID: 28601009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Source apportionment using reconstructed mass calculations.
Siddique N; Waheed S
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2014; 49(4):463-77. PubMed ID: 24345244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Matrix effects in PIXE analysis of aerosols and ashes.
Havránek V; Kucera J; Horáková J; Vosecek V; Smolík J; Schwarz J; Sýkorová I
Biol Trace Elem Res; 1999; 71-72():431-42. PubMed ID: 10676519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total reflection X-ray fluorescence (TXRF) for direct analysis of aerosol particle samples.
Bontempi E; Zacco A; Benedetti D; Borgese L; Colombi P; Stosnach H; Finzi G; Apostoli P; Buttini P; Depero LE
Environ Technol; 2010 Apr; 31(5):467-77. PubMed ID: 20480822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a passive aerosol sampler to size-selective pump samplers in indoor environments.
Wagner J; Macher JM
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(5):630-9. PubMed ID: 14521436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncertainty determination for nondestructive chemical analytical methods using field data and application to XRF analysis for lead.
Bartley DL; Slaven JE; Rose MC; Andrew ME; Harper M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Dec; 4(12):931-42. PubMed ID: 17957563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Inter-comparison of WPS-TEOM-MOUDI and investigation on particle density].
Gao J; Zhou Y; Wang J; Wang T; Wang WX
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2007 Sep; 28(9):1929-34. PubMed ID: 17990533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a portable X-ray fluorescence instrument for the determination of lead in workplace air samples.
Morley JC; Clark CS; Deddens JA; Ashley K; Roda S
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 1999 May; 14(5):306-16. PubMed ID: 10446483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of two different acidic aerosol samplers to measure acidic aerosols in Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Tsai CJ; Perng SB; Chiou SF
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Dec; 50(12):2120-8. PubMed ID: 11153491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
