These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 960379)
1. Nuclear lacrimal scan vs dacryocystography. Saparoff GR; Chaudhuri T; Chaudhuri T; Dolan KD; Christie JH Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1976; 81(4 Pt 1):OP566-74. PubMed ID: 960379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intubation macrodacryocystography and quantitative scintillography: the "complete" lacrimal assessment. Hurwitz JJ; Welham RA; Maisey MN Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1976; 81(4 Pt 1):OP575-82. PubMed ID: 785750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the investigation of epiphora in patients with patent but nonfunctioning lacrimal systems. Peter NM; Pearson AR Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009; 25(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 19454931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical diagnosis of lacrimal duct obstruction by digital subtraction dacryocystography]. Xian MY; Jiang YQ; Zhang ZS Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2001 Feb; 26(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 12536629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Dacryocystography in epiphora caused by a dacryolith]. Agahi M Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1966 Mar; 104(3):425-7. PubMed ID: 6010855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of contrast dacryocystogram and nuclear dacryocystogram. Chaudhuri RK; Saparoff GR; Dolan KD; Chaudhuri TK J Nucl Med; 1975 Jul; 16(7):605-8. PubMed ID: 1151478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of intubation dacryocystography and quantitative lacrimal scintillography]. Du L Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1986 Nov; 22(6):353-7. PubMed ID: 3100254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Bilateral dacryocystography using digital subtraction technic for kinetic evaluation of the lacrimal passage]. Schmidt W; Hessemer V; Rauber K Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 2272587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional obstruction of the lacrimal drainage passages. Rosenstock T; Hurwitz JJ Can J Ophthalmol; 1982 Dec; 17(6):249-55. PubMed ID: 7165839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis of lacrimal drainage malfunction (with emphasis on the technetium 99m scan). Saparoff GR Ophthalmic Semin; 1976; 1(2):135-70. PubMed ID: 1023090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of dacryocystography in the management of patients with epiphora. Nixon J; Birchall IW; Virjee J Br J Radiol; 1990 May; 63(749):337-9. PubMed ID: 2379059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity. Usmani E; Shapira Y; Selva D Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug; 43(8):2687-2693. PubMed ID: 36952153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative lacrimal scintigraphy after dacryocystorhinostomy. Zilelioglu G; Küçük O; Tekeli O; Günan F; Aras G Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2004; 35(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 14750762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The fluorescein appearance test for lacrimal obstruction. Flach A Ann Ophthalmol; 1979 Feb; 11(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 434742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lacrimal imaging findings in fellow asymptomatic eyes of unilateral epiphora. Macri C; Shapira Y; Selva D Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):3328-3332. PubMed ID: 35261267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]