These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9604054)

  • 1. Evaluation of the European Spine Phantom in a multi-centre clinical trial.
    Lees B; Garland SW; Walton C; Stevenson JC
    Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(6):570-4. PubMed ID: 9604054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom.
    Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10501774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
    Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo and in vitro comparison of densitometers in the NOREPOS study.
    Omsland TK; Emaus N; Gjesdal CG; Falch JA; Tell GS; Forsen L; Berntsen GK; Meyer HE
    J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 18158262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Instrument performance in bone density testing at five Australian centres.
    Khan KM; Henzell SL; Broderick C; Prince RL; Saul A; Lomman J; Wark JD
    Aust N Z J Med; 1997 Oct; 27(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 9404582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The European Spine Phantom--a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT.
    Kalender WA; Felsenberg D; Genant HK; Fischer M; Dequeker J; Reeve J
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 20(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 7588873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group.
    Pearson J; Dequeker J; Henley M; Bright J; Reeve J; Kalender W; Laval-Jeantet AM; Rüegsegger P; Felsenberg D; Adams J
    Osteoporos Int; 1995 May; 5(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 7655178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-calibration and comparison of variability in 2 bone densitometers in a research setting: the framingham experience.
    Gagnon DR; McLean RR; Hannan MT; Cupples LA; Hogan M; Kiel DP
    J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 20347371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone mineral density measures in longitudinal studies: the choice of phantom is crucial for quality assessment. The Tromsø study, a population-based study.
    Emaus N; Berntsen GK; Joakimsen R; Fønnebø V
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1597-603. PubMed ID: 15886862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
    Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
    Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of longitudinal measurements in the spine and proximal femur using lunar and hologic instruments.
    Pocock NA; Noakes KA; Griffiths M; Bhalerao N; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA; Freund J
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Dec; 12(12):2113-8. PubMed ID: 9421245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.
    Finkelstein JS; Butler JP; Cleary RL; Neer RM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1945-52. PubMed ID: 7872060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in whole body measurements by DXA-scanning using two Lunar DPX-L machines.
    Lantz H; Samuelson G; Bratteby LE; Mallmin H; Sjöström L
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1999 Jul; 23(7):764-70. PubMed ID: 10454112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discordance of longitudinal changes in bone density between densitometers.
    Frost SA; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
    Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 17870039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The long-term performance of DXA bone densitometers.
    Wells J; Ryan PJ
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 73(871):737-9. PubMed ID: 11089465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increasing soft tissue thickness does not affect trabecular bone score reproducibility: a phantom study.
    Messina C; Poloni A; Chianca V; Albano D; Piodi LP; Ulivieri FM; Sconfienza LM
    Endocrine; 2018 Aug; 61(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29948934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements.
    Guo Y; Franks PW; Brookshire T; Antonio Tataranni P
    Obes Res; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 15687392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Densitometer-Specific Differences in the Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score.
    Mazzetti G; Berger C; Leslie WD; Hans D; Langsetmo L; Hanley DA; Kovacs CS; Prior JC; Kaiser SM; Davison KS; Josse R; Papaioannou A; Adachi JR; Goltzman D; Morin SN;
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 28034592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.