These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9604099)

  • 61. Perceiving spatially inseparable objects: evidence for feature-based object selection not mediated by location.
    Hübner R; Backer G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1556-67. PubMed ID: 10641311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Reaction time drifts identify objects of attention in pigeon visual search.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1993 Apr; 19(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 8505592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search.
    Horstmann G
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 12430832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):764-87. PubMed ID: 17683227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Visual selection mediated by location: selecting successive visual objects.
    Cave KR; Pashler H
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 May; 57(4):421-32. PubMed ID: 7596740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Attention capture is temporally stable: Evidence from mixed-model correlations.
    Weichselbaum H; Huber-Huber C; Ansorge U
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():206-224. PubMed ID: 30081374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
    Berry JH
    Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference.
    Kumada T
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):61-79. PubMed ID: 10070200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Increasing distractor strength improves accuracy.
    Sheremata S; Sakagami M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Apr; 102(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 16826673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
    Kerzel D; Barras C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Exploring the breadth of the top-down representations that control attentional disengagement.
    Wright TJ; Boot WR; Jones JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):993-1006. PubMed ID: 25295752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
    Levinthal BR; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features.
    Chen Z
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 19303423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. How Distractor Objects Trigger Referential Overspecification: Testing the Effects of Visual Clutter and Distractor Distance.
    Koolen R; Krahmer E; Swerts M
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Sep; 40(7):1617-1647. PubMed ID: 26432277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Binding targets' responses to distractors' locations: distractor response bindings in a location-priming task.
    Frings C; Möller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2176-83. PubMed ID: 21097861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition.
    Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.