These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9604345)

  • 21. Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: some properties of "central" auditory gap detection.
    Phillips DP; Taylor TL; Hall SE; Carr MM; Mossop JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3694-705. PubMed ID: 9193057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1166-72. PubMed ID: 11303930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants.
    Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):850-60. PubMed ID: 9972570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2156-64. PubMed ID: 1597606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Within- and across-channel gap detection in cochlear implant listeners.
    Grose JH; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3651-8. PubMed ID: 18247772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    Zeng FG; Galvin JJ; Zhang C
    Neuroreport; 1998 Jun; 9(8):1845-8. PubMed ID: 9665613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Loudness growth observed under partially tripolar stimulation: model and data from cochlear implant listeners.
    Litvak LM; Spahr AJ; Emadi G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):967-81. PubMed ID: 17672645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):998-1009. PubMed ID: 10462805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gap detection by early-deafened cochlear-implant subjects.
    Busby PA; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1841-52. PubMed ID: 10089607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
    Botros A; Psarros C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ESRT, ART, and MCL correlations in experienced paediatric cochlear implant users.
    Walkowiak A; Lorens A; Kostek B; Skarzynski H; Polak M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():482-4. PubMed ID: 21756678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Psychophysical laws revealed by electric hearing.
    Zeng FG; Shannon RV
    Neuroreport; 1999 Jun; 10(9):1931-5. PubMed ID: 10501535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Changes in the hearing and discomfort thresholds in patients with the Clark/nucleus inner ear prosthesis].
    Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E; Laszig R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Aug; 67(8):412-5. PubMed ID: 3210875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing neural response telemetry amplitude growth functions with loudness growth functions: preliminary results.
    Lai WK; Dillier N
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):42S-45S. PubMed ID: 17496644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The perception of temporal modulations by cochlear implant patients.
    Busby PA; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jul; 94(1):124-31. PubMed ID: 8354754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.