These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9604575)

  • 1. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives.
    Davidson CL; Feilzer AJ
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 9604575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
    Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volumetric polymerization shrinkage of various composites.
    Tolidis K; Nobecourt A; Randall RC
    Dent Mater; 1998 Nov; 14(6):417-23. PubMed ID: 10483404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Sidhu SK; Sherriff M; Watson TF
    J Dent Res; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1495-501. PubMed ID: 9240386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developments in shrinkage control of adhesive restoratives.
    Dauvillier BS; Aarnts MP; Feilzer AJ
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(6):291-9. PubMed ID: 14743524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of lining materials on the composite resins shrinkage stresses.
    Ikemi T; Nemoto K
    Dent Mater J; 1994 Jun; 13(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7842636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective Expansion: Balance between Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion.
    Suiter EA; Watson LE; Tantbirojn D; Lou JS; Versluis A
    J Dent Res; 2016 May; 95(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 26912221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing composite restoration polymerization shrinkage stress through resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesives.
    Naoum SJ; Mutzelburg PR; Shumack TG; Thode D; Martin FE; Ellakwa AE
    Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec; 60(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 25476699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength of restorative materials to hydroxyapatite inserts and dimensional changes of insert-containing restorations during polymerization.
    Lezaja M; Veljovic D; Manojlovic D; Milosevic M; Mitrovic N; Janackovic D; Miletic V
    Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 25541508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites.
    Boaro LC; Gonçalves F; Guimarães TC; Ferracane JL; Versluis A; Braga RR
    Dent Mater; 2010 Dec; 26(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 20832850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting.
    Dauvillier BS; Feilzer AJ; De Gee AJ; Davidson CL
    J Dent Res; 2000 Mar; 79(3):818-23. PubMed ID: 10765954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Giráldez I; Ceballos L
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Handling of mechanical stresses in composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Davidson-Kaban SS
    Dent Update; 1998 Sep; 25(7):274-9. PubMed ID: 10478021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the shear bond strengths to a resin composite of two conventional and two resin-modified glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements.
    Chadwick RG; Woolford MJ
    J Dent; 1993 Apr; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 8473591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility.
    Kemp-Scholte CM; Davidson CL
    J Dent Res; 1990 Jun; 69(6):1240-3. PubMed ID: 2141338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.