These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9604664)
1. The peer review privilege: what documents are protected from discovery in litigation. Smart CM Mo Med; 1998 May; 95(5):205-6. PubMed ID: 9604664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. FL: does peer review apply to nurses notes?: defendant dr. attempts to invoke peer privilege. Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Feb; 39(9):3. PubMed ID: 10223027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Facing the limits on uses of medical and peer review information: are high technology and confidentiality on a collision course? Brown LC; Stanton WC; Paye W Whittier Law Rev; 1997; 19(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 12071205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal review: a case study from California--the sharing of peer review information between hospitals and nonhospital providers. Brown LC Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 May; 14(4):68-73. PubMed ID: 10134763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review: confidentiality and privilege--Part Two. Devlin MM J Med Pract Manage; 2001; 16(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 11345885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting hospital records from discovery. Ropiequet JL Physician Exec; 1993; 19(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 10129389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Producing medical records in litigation. Schulte DJ Mich Med; 2005; 104(3):7. PubMed ID: 15898273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What's new with peer review? Morrow JA Mo Med; 1995 Dec; 92(12):723-6. PubMed ID: 8587563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Promoting better health care: policy arguments for concurrent quality assurance and attorney-client hospital incident report privileges. Dollar CJ Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(1):259-308. PubMed ID: 10138438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How to protect confidentiality during the contracting process. Mishek MG; Whitmore MR; Blazevic DJ QRC Advis; 1995 Feb; 11(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 10140293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal access to patient health records/protection of quality assurance activities. Feehan KP Health Law Can; 1991; 12(1):3-10, 31. PubMed ID: 10114435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence: discovery and "medical peer review" committee privileges. Halpern A J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):406-7. PubMed ID: 11317431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Courts examine use of peer review documents. Young v. Saldanha; Ashokan v. Nevada. Hosp Law Newsl; 1994 Jun; 11(8):5-8. PubMed ID: 10184108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Friend of the court. Tex Med; 1997 Jul; 93(7):24-6. PubMed ID: 9226986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The HIPAA privacy rule and physician responses to medical-record requests in civil litigation. Jackson JZ N J Med; 2003 Sep; 100(9):21-6. PubMed ID: 14556590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical records and their use in litigation. Wooddell J Mo Med; 1997 Apr; 94(4):168-70. PubMed ID: 9103832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer-review records can be subpoenaed. Hallam K; Moore JD Mod Healthc; 1999 Jun; 29(24):3, 16. PubMed ID: 10538573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change? Scheutzow SO Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]