108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9605304)
1. Pediatric coverage of the delivery room: an analysis of manpower utilization.
Eidelman AI; Schimmel MS; Bromiker R; Hammerman C
J Perinatol; 1998; 18(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9605304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cesarean deliveries: when is a pediatrician necessary?
Jacob J; Pfenninger J
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Feb; 89(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 9015023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Birth asphyxia and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, incidence and obstetric risk factors].
Palsdottir K; Dagbjartsson A; Thorkelsson T; Hardardottir H
Laeknabladid; 2007 Sep; 93(9):595-601. PubMed ID: 17823499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is pediatric attendance necessary for all cesarean sections?
Gonzalez F; Juliano S
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2002 Mar; 102(3):127-9. PubMed ID: 11926690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pediatric presence at cesarean section: justified or not?
Gordon A; McKechnie EJ; Jeffery H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 1):599-605. PubMed ID: 16150248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.
Landon MB; Spong CY; Thom E; Hauth JC; Bloom SL; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 16816050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in attendance at deliveries by pediatric residents 2000 to 2005.
Lee HC; Rhee CJ; Sectish TC; Hintz SR
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Feb; 26(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 18850515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Timing of scheduled cesarean delivery in patients on a teaching versus private service: adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and neonatal outcomes.
Laye MR; Dellinger EH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):577-82; discussion 582-4. PubMed ID: 16777051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Obstetric outcomes in 102 pregnancies after preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Strom CM; Strom S; Levine E; Ginsberg N; Barton J; Verlinsky Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1629-32. PubMed ID: 10871489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
Schor EL;
Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.
Richardson BS; Czikk MJ; daSilva O; Natale R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 15672028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Severe maternal morbidity and the mode of delivery.
Pallasmaa N; Ekblad U; Gissler M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(6):662-8. PubMed ID: 18568466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.
Loebel G; Zelop CM; Egan JF; Wax J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15280132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Average charges for uncomplicated cesarean and vaginal deliveries, United States, 1993.
Mushinski M
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1994; 75(4):27-36. PubMed ID: 7817268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
