261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9605762)
1. Chromosomal gains and losses in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
Bastian BC; LeBoit PE; Hamm H; Bröcker EB; Pinkel D
Cancer Res; 1998 May; 58(10):2170-5. PubMed ID: 9605762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic alterations in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization with laser capture or manual microdissection: 6p gains may predict poor outcome.
Namiki T; Yanagawa S; Izumo T; Ishikawa M; Tachibana M; Kawakami Y; Yokozeki H; Nishioka K; Kaneko Y
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Feb; 157(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15676140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of DNA gains and losses in primary renal clear cell carcinomas and metastatic sites: importance of 1q and 3p copy number changes in metastatic events.
Gronwald J; Störkel S; Holtgreve-Grez H; Hadaczek P; Brinkschmidt C; Jauch A; Lubinski J; Cremer T
Cancer Res; 1997 Feb; 57(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 9012478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chromosomal gains and losses in uveal melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
Speicher MR; Prescher G; du Manoir S; Jauch A; Horsthemke B; Bornfeld N; Becher R; Cremer T
Cancer Res; 1994 Jul; 54(14):3817-23. PubMed ID: 8033101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concomitant loss of chromosome 3 and whole arm losses and gains of chromosome 1, 6, or 8 in metastasizing primary uveal melanoma.
Aalto Y; Eriksson L; Seregard S; Larsson O; Knuutila S
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):313-7. PubMed ID: 11157859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distinct chromosomal aberrations in sinonasal mucosal melanoma as detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
van Dijk M; Sprenger S; Rombout P; Marres H; Kaanders J; Jeuken J; Ruiter D
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Feb; 36(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 12508243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of chromosomal alterations in bladder transitional cell carcinomas from Northern China by comparative genomic hybridization.
Qin SL; Chen XJ; Xu X; Shou JZ; Bi XG; Ji L; Han YL; Cai Y; Wei F; Ma JH; Wu M; Zhan QM; Wang MR
Cancer Lett; 2006 Jul; 238(2):230-9. PubMed ID: 16125302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis.
Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH
Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristic pattern of chromosomal gains and losses in Merkel cell carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
Van Gele M; Speleman F; Vandesompele J; Van Roy N; Leonard JH
Cancer Res; 1998 Apr; 58(7):1503-8. PubMed ID: 9537255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic profiling of malignant melanoma using tiling-resolution arrayCGH.
Jönsson G; Dahl C; Staaf J; Sandberg T; Bendahl PO; Ringnér M; Guldberg P; Borg A
Oncogene; 2007 Jul; 26(32):4738-48. PubMed ID: 17260012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative genomic hybridization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors reveals different patterns of chromosomal gains and losses in fibroadenomas and diploid and aneuploid carcinomas.
Ried T; Just KE; Holtgreve-Grez H; du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Schröck E; Latham C; Blegen H; Zetterberg A; Cremer T
Cancer Res; 1995 Nov; 55(22):5415-23. PubMed ID: 7585611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic aberrations in carcinomas of the uterine corpus.
Micci F; Teixeira MR; Haugom L; Kristensen G; Abeler VM; Heim S
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2004 Jul; 40(3):229-46. PubMed ID: 15139002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gains and losses of DNA sequences in osteosarcomas by comparative genomic hybridization.
Tarkkanen M; Karhu R; Kallioniemi A; Elomaa I; Kivioja AH; Nevalainen J; Böhling T; Karaharju E; Hyytinen E; Knuutila S
Cancer Res; 1995 Mar; 55(6):1334-8. PubMed ID: 7882332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classifying melanocytic tumors based on DNA copy number changes.
Bastian BC; Olshen AB; LeBoit PE; Pinkel D
Am J Pathol; 2003 Nov; 163(5):1765-70. PubMed ID: 14578177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative genomic hybridization of malignant fibrous histiocytoma reveals a novel prognostic marker.
Larramendy ML; Tarkkanen M; Blomqvist C; Virolainen M; Wiklund T; Asko-Seljavaara S; Elomaa I; Knuutila S
Am J Pathol; 1997 Oct; 151(4):1153-61. PubMed ID: 9327749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A copy number gain of the 6p arm is linked with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an array-based comparative genomic hybridization study.
Chochi Y; Kawauchi S; Nakao M; Furuya T; Hashimoto K; Oga A; Oka M; Sasaki K
J Pathol; 2009 Apr; 217(5):677-84. PubMed ID: 19097070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA sequence copy number changes in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: tumor progression and prognostic significance.
El-Rifai W; Sarlomo-Rikala M; Andersson LC; Knuutila S; Miettinen M
Cancer Res; 2000 Jul; 60(14):3899-903. PubMed ID: 10919666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chromosomal changes during development and progression of prostate adenocarcinomas.
Zitzelsberger H; Engert D; Walch A; Kulka U; Aubele M; Höfler H; Bauchinger M; Werner M
Br J Cancer; 2001 Jan; 84(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 11161378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simple specific pattern of chromosomal aberrations at early stages of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: PIK3CA but not p63 gene as a likely target of 3q26-qter gains.
Redon R; Muller D; Caulee K; Wanherdrick K; Abecassis J; du Manoir S
Cancer Res; 2001 May; 61(10):4122-9. PubMed ID: 11358835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and cytogenetic analyses in uveal melanoma.
Kilic E; van Gils W; Lodder E; Beverloo HB; van Til ME; Mooy CM; Paridaens D; de Klein A; Luyten GP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Sep; 47(9):3703-7. PubMed ID: 16936076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
