These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9606930)

  • 1. Response distribution as an explanation of the mirror effect.
    Glanzer M; Kim K; Adams JK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 May; 24(3):633-44. PubMed ID: 9606930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory.
    Hoshino Y
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Nov; 19(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 1758305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.
    Reder LM; Angstadt P; Cary M; Erickson MA; Ayers MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):138-52. PubMed ID: 11827076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: symmetry in motion.
    Hilford A; Glanzer M; Kim K
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):593-605. PubMed ID: 9337579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shades of the mirror effect: recognition of faces with and without sunglasses.
    Hockley WE; Hemsworth DH; Consoli A
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 10087862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.
    Diana RA; Reder LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):805-15. PubMed ID: 16822148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Associative spread as a mediating variable in the generation effect.
    Widner RL
    Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 8556532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition failure of categorised words: further evidence of exceptions.
    Gardiner JM; Mäntylä T; Nilsson LG
    Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 8556534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. False positives in recognition memory produced by cohort activation.
    Wallace WP; Stewart MT; Sherman HL; Mellor MD
    Cognition; 1995 Apr; 55(1):85-113. PubMed ID: 7758271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orthographic neighborhood size effects and associative recognition.
    Glanc GA; Greene RL
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 19353931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forgetting and the mirror effect in recognition memory: concentering of underlying distributions.
    Glanzer M; Adams JK; Iverson G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 1826733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Remembering" words not presented in lists: relevance to the current recovered/false memory controversy.
    Freyd JJ; Gleaves DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):811-3; discussion 814-6. PubMed ID: 8656157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments.
    Inoue C; Bellezza FS
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 9584437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition and frequency judgments in young and elderly adults.
    Freund JS; Witte KL
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(1):81-102. PubMed ID: 3717457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What do we know about what we cannot remember? Accessing the semantic attributes of words that cannot be recalled.
    Koriat A; Levy-Sadot R; Edry E; de Marcas S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1095-105. PubMed ID: 14622049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intralist interference in recognition memory.
    Kim K; Glanzer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1096-107. PubMed ID: 8744957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.
    Stretch V; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1379-96. PubMed ID: 9835059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of response bias on recall performance, with some observations on processing bias.
    Erdelyi MH; Finks J; Feigin-Pfau MB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Sep; 118(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 2527949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.
    Clark SE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 1508049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accessing the particular from the general: the power of distinctiveness in the context of organization.
    Hunt RR; Smith RE
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Mar; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 8881324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.