These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Efficacy of endopyelotomy in patients with secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Patel T; Kellner CP; Katsumi H; Gupta M J Endourol; 2011 Apr; 25(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 21388243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of percutaneous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Rukin NJ; Ashdown DA; Patel P; Liu S Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Mar; 89(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 17346411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. Baldwin DD; Dunbar JA; Wells N; McDougall EM J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12803987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of Acucise endopyelotomy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Biyani CS; Minhas S; el Cast J; Almond DJ; Cooksey G; Hetherington JW Eur Urol; 2002 Mar; 41(3):305-10; discussion 310-1. PubMed ID: 12180233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrograde ureteroscopic holmium laser endopyelotomy in a selected population of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Stilling NM; Jung H; Nørby B; Osther SS; Osther PJ Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 18949631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty. Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Skeldon S; Dave S; Bagli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL; Farhat WA J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution. Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous endopyelotomy in infants and young children after failed open pyeloplasty. Faerber GJ; Ritchey ML; Bloom DA J Urol; 1995 Oct; 154(4):1495-7. PubMed ID: 7658575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contemporary results of endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Sim HG; Tan YH; Wong M Ann Acad Med Singap; 2005 Mar; 34(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 15827665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Park J; Kim WS; Hong B; Park T; Park HK Int J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 18422578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]