These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9607463)

  • 1. Progressive depolarization: a unified hypothesis for defibrillation and fibrillation induction by shocks.
    Dillon SM; Kwaku KF
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 May; 9(5):529-52. PubMed ID: 9607463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current concepts of ventricular defibrillation.
    Chen PS; Swerdlow CD; Hwang C; Karagueuzian HS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 May; 9(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 9607464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.
    Swerdlow CD; Shehata M; Chen PS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 17338725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanisms of defibrillation. Critical points and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Walcott GP; Walcott KT; Ideker RE
    J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():1-6. PubMed ID: 8656095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Relationship Between Cardiac Vulnerability and Restitution Properties of the Ventricular Activation Recovery Interval.
    Yamashita S; Yoshida A; Fukuzawa K; Nakanishi T; Matsumoto A; Konishi H; Ichibori H; Hyogo K; Imada H; Hirata K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 25810143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.
    Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mechanism of induction and termination of ventricular fibrillation--significance of dispersion of ventricular repolarization].
    Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR; Schultheiss HP
    Z Kardiol; 2000 Dec; 89(12):1098-107. PubMed ID: 11201025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks.
    Wang NC; Lee MH; Ohara T; Okuyama Y; Fishbein GA; Lin SF; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS
    Circulation; 2001 Jul; 104(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11447091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1351-9. PubMed ID: 9286969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation probability of success curves using a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Souza JJ; Malkin RA; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 7850965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Myocardial vulnerability to T wave shocks: relation to shock strength, shock coupling interval, and dispersion of ventricular repolarization.
    Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Mar; 7(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 8867297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shock-induced dispersion of ventricular repolarization: implications for the induction of ventricular fibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Behrens S; Li C; Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):998-1008. PubMed ID: 9300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal strength and number of shocks at upper limit of vulnerability testing required to predict high defibrillation threshold without inducing ventricular fibrillation.
    Takami K; Yoshida A; Fukuzawa K; Takei A; Kiuchi K; Kanda G; Kumagai H; Takami M; Torii-Tanaka S; Itoh M; Imamura K; Fujiwara R; Suzuki A; Nakanishi T; Yamashita S; Matsumoto A; Hirata K
    Circ J; 2013; 77(10):2490-6. PubMed ID: 23877733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation.
    Kirilmaz A; Dokumaci B; Uzun M; Kilicaslan F; Dinckal MH; Yucel O; Karaca M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):498-505. PubMed ID: 15955181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of cardiac compression on defibrillation efficacy and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Idriss SF; Anstadt MP; Anstadt GL; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 May; 6(5):368-78. PubMed ID: 7551306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The zone of vulnerability to T wave shocks in humans.
    Swerdlow CD; Martin DJ; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9147699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graded response and restitution hypotheses of ventricular vulnerability to fibrillation: insights into the mechanism of initiation of fibrillation.
    Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS
    J Electrocardiol; 1999; 32 Suppl():87-91. PubMed ID: 10688308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves.
    Malkin RA; Idriss SF; Walker RG; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 7648678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.