These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Graded response and restitution hypotheses of ventricular vulnerability to fibrillation: insights into the mechanism of initiation of fibrillation. Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS J Electrocardiol; 1999; 32 Suppl():87-91. PubMed ID: 10688308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm. Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaction between strong electrical stimulation and reentrant wavefronts in canine ventricular fibrillation. Bonometti C; Hwang C; Hough D; Lee JJ; Fishbein MC; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS Circ Res; 1995 Aug; 77(2):407-16. PubMed ID: 7614724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks. Wang NC; Lee MH; Ohara T; Okuyama Y; Fishbein GA; Lin SF; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS Circulation; 2001 Jul; 104(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11447091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The zone of vulnerability to T wave shocks in humans. Swerdlow CD; Martin DJ; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Chen PS J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9147699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cellular mechanism of reentry induced by a strong electrical stimulus: implications for fibrillation and defibrillation. Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS Cardiovasc Res; 2001 May; 50(2):251-62. PubMed ID: 11334829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recurrent appearance of protective zones after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock. Hwang C; Fan W; Chen PS Am J Physiol; 1996 Oct; 271(4 Pt 2):H1491-7. PubMed ID: 8897944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and site of initiation on the defibrillation threshold during early ventricular fibrillation. Strobel JS; Kenknight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 32(2):521-7. PubMed ID: 9708486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Progressive depolarization: a unified hypothesis for defibrillation and fibrillation induction by shocks. Dillon SM; Kwaku KF J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 May; 9(5):529-52. PubMed ID: 9607463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cellular graded responses and ventricular vulnerability to reentry by a premature stimulus in isolated canine ventricle. Gotoh M; Uchida T; Mandel WJ; Fishbein MC; Chen PS; Karagueuzian HS Circulation; 1997 Apr; 95(8):2141-54. PubMed ID: 9133525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs. Swerdlow CD; Shehata M; Chen PS Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 17338725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reentry site during fibrillation induction in relation to defibrillation efficacy for different shock waveforms. Ideker RE; Alferness C; Melnick S; Sreenan KM; Johnson E; Smith WM J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 May; 12(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 11386521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation probability of success curves using a nonthoracotomy lead system. Souza JJ; Malkin RA; Ideker RE Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 7850965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Myocardial vulnerability to T wave shocks: relation to shock strength, shock coupling interval, and dispersion of ventricular repolarization. Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Mar; 7(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 8867297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the basis of the upper limit of vulnerability. Swerdlow CD; Peter CT; Kass RM; Gang ES; Mandel WJ; Hwang C; Martin DJ; Chen PS Circulation; 1997 Mar; 95(6):1497-504. PubMed ID: 9118518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability. Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanisms of defibrillation. Critical points and the upper limit of vulnerability. Walcott GP; Walcott KT; Ideker RE J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():1-6. PubMed ID: 8656095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves. Malkin RA; Idriss SF; Walker RG; Ideker RE Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 7648678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation. Kirilmaz A; Dokumaci B; Uzun M; Kilicaslan F; Dinckal MH; Yucel O; Karaca M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):498-505. PubMed ID: 15955181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]