These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9608244)

  • 1. [Rational radiologic diagnosis of breast carcinoma].
    Mödder U; Mosny DS
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1998 Apr; 87(15):499-503. PubMed ID: 9608244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Modern diagnostics of the breast].
    Kaiser WA; Diedrich K; Reiser M; Krebs D
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Jan; 53(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 8382649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [MR mammography].
    Kaiser WA
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):292-9. PubMed ID: 8390704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period].
    Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Weigel S; Nüssle-Kügele K; Sittek H; Arand B; Morakkabati N; Leutner C; Tombach B; Nordhoff D; Perlet C; Rieber A; Heindel W; Brambs HJ; Schild H
    Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 15902631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast imaging and needle biopsy in women with clinically evident breast cancer: does combined imaging change overall diagnostic sensitivity?
    Ciatto S; Houssami N
    Breast; 2007 Aug; 16(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 17350262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
    Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
    Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
    Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Warner E
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 19(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 18941396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Radiological diagnosis in breast carcinoma].
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Schreer I
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1995 Mar; 84(13):361-5. PubMed ID: 7709115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Diagnosis of breast cancer in the clinical stage T1].
    Bartl W; Euller A; Pfersmann C; Bernaschek G; Breitenecker G
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1984 Oct; 96(19):722-7. PubMed ID: 6098079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.
    Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J
    Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the diagnostic methods on the therapeutic strategies.
    Greco M; Agresti R; Giovanazzi R
    Q J Nucl Med; 1998 Mar; 42(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 9646647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].
    Kocjan G
    Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    Gibbs P; Liney GP; Lowry M; Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW
    Breast; 2004 Apr; 13(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15019691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
    Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
    Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Breast self-examination also valuable in women participating in a screening programme].
    Zonderhuis BM; Meijer S; Been J; Groot JJ; Langenhorst F; van den Tol MP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2341-5. PubMed ID: 19024066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Italian multi-centre project on evaluation of MRI and other imaging modalities in early detection of breast cancer in subjects at high genetic risk.
    Podo F; Sardanelli F; Canese R; D'Agnolo G; Natali PG; Crecco M; Grandinetti ML; Musumeci R; Trecate G; Bergonzi S; De Simone T; Costa C; Pasini B; Manuokian S; Spatti GB; Vergnaghi D; Morassut S; Boiocchi M; Dolcetti R; Viel A; De Giacomi C; Veronesi A; Coran F; Silingardi V; Turchett D; Cortesi L; De Santis M; Federico M; Romagnoli R; Ferrari S; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C; Caligo MA; Cilotti A; Marini C; Cirillo S; Marra V; Martincich L; Contegiacomo A; Pensabene M; Capuano I; Burgazzi GB; Petrillo A; Bonomo L; Carriero A; Mariani-Costantini R; Battista P; Cama A; Palca G; Di Maggio C; D'Andrea E; Bazzocchi M; Francescutti GE; Zuiani C; Londero V; Zunnui I; Gustavino C; Centurioni MG; Iozzelli A; Panizza P; Del Maschio A
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):115-24. PubMed ID: 12585665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.