241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9608381)
1. Reliability of spinal displacement analysis of plain X-rays: a review of commonly accepted facts and fallacies with implications for chiropractic education and technique.
Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Troyanovich SJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 May; 21(4):252-66. PubMed ID: 9608381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeatability over time of posture, radiograph positioning, and radiograph line drawing: an analysis of six control groups.
Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Colloca CJ; Betz J; Janik TJ; Holland B
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Feb; 26(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 12584507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of spinal displacement analysis on plain X-rays: a review of commonly accepted facts and fallacies with implications for chiropractic education and technique.
Hart J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(9):657. PubMed ID: 9868639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Line drawing analyses of static cervical X ray used in chiropractic.
Owens EF
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Sep; 15(7):442-9. PubMed ID: 1431632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation of abnormal lumbosacral spine radiographs. A test comparing students, clinicians, radiology residents, and radiologists in medicine and chiropractic.
Taylor JA; Clopton P; Bosch E; Miller KA; Marcelis S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 May; 20(10):1147-53; discussion 1154. PubMed ID: 7638657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Full-spine radiography: a review.
Taylor JA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993 Sep; 16(7):460-74. PubMed ID: 8228649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of lumbosacral spine radiograph reading by chiropractors, chiropractic radiologists, and medical radiologists.
de Zoete A; Assendelft WJ; Algra PR; Oberman WR; Vanderschueren GM; Bezemer PD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Sep; 27(17):1926-33; discussion 1933. PubMed ID: 12221360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of spinal alignment disorders in adults].
Guigui P; Morvan G
J Radiol; 2002 Sep; 83(9 Pt 2):1143-7. PubMed ID: 12223972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter/Intraobserver Reliability of T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA), a Novel Radiographic Measure for Global Sagittal Deformity.
Plachta SM; Israel H; Brechbuhler J; Hayes A; Huebner S; Place HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(21):E1290-E1296. PubMed ID: 29659441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional spinal coupling mechanics: Part II. Implications for chiropractic theories and practice.
Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Troyanovich SJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 9567238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of variation in arm position on sagittal spinal alignment.
Vedantam R; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Linville DL; Blanke K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Sep; 25(17):2204-9. PubMed ID: 10973404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-specific 3D models created by 3D imaging system or bi-planar imaging coupled with Moiré-Fringe projections: a comparative study of accuracy and reliability on spinal curvatures and vertebral rotation data.
Hocquelet A; Cornelis F; Jirot A; Castaings L; de Sèze M; Hauger O
Eur Spine J; 2016 Oct; 25(10):3154-3161. PubMed ID: 27323963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of lateral bending and axial rotation with validity of a new method to determine axial rotation on anteroposterior cervical radiographs.
Janik T; Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Holland B; Coleman RR; Payne MR
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Sep; 24(7):445-8. PubMed ID: 11562652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Further reliability analysis of the Harrison radiographic line-drawing methods: crossed ICCs for lateral posterior tangents and modified Risser-Ferguson method on AP views.
Harrison DE; Holland B; Harrison DD; Janik TJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002 Feb; 25(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 11896376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: A review.
Ames CP; Smith JS; Scheer JK; Bess S; Bederman SS; Deviren V; Lafage V; Schwab F; Shaffrey CI
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):547-64. PubMed ID: 22443546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain.
French SD; Green S; Forbes A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 May; 23(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 10820295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Line drawing analyses of static cervical x ray used in chiropractic.
Schultz FE
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993 May; 16(4):280. PubMed ID: 8340726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Plain film radiology in chiropractic.
Phillips RB
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Jan; 15(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1531491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Static and dynamic components of the chiropractic subluxation complex: a literature review.
Dishman RW
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1988 Apr; 11(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 3290377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Hangover: The Early and Lasting Effects of the Controversial Incorporation of X-Ray Technology into Chiropractic.
Young KJ; Bakkum BW; Siordia L
Health History; 2016; 18(1):111-36. PubMed ID: 29470036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
