These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9608483)

  • 21. Direct measurement of absorbed dose to water in HDR 192Ir brachytherapy: water calorimetry, ionization chamber, Gafchromic film, and TG-43.
    Sarfehnia A; Kawrakow I; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1924-32. PubMed ID: 20443514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new re-entrant ionization chamber for the calibration of iridium-192 high dose rate sources.
    Goetsch SJ; Attix FH; DeWerd LA; Thomadsen BR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1992; 24(1):167-70. PubMed ID: 1512153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of calibration procedures for 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources.
    Baltas D; Geramani K; Ioannidis GT; Hierholz K; Rogge B; Kolotas C; Müller-Sievers K; Milickovic N; Kober B; Zamboglou N
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Feb; 43(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 10078653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Correction factors for source strength determination in HDR brachytherapy using the in-phantom method.
    Ubrich F; Wulff J; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2014 May; 24(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 24021956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phase III randomized trial comparing LDR and HDR brachytherapy in treatment of cervical carcinoma.
    Lertsanguansinchai P; Lertbutsayanukul C; Shotelersuk K; Khorprasert C; Rojpornpradit P; Chottetanaprasith T; Srisuthep A; Suriyapee S; Jumpangern C; Tresukosol D; Charoonsantikul C
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Aug; 59(5):1424-31. PubMed ID: 15275728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective study of HDR (192Ir) versus MDR (137Cs) intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Tanaka E; Oh RJ; Yamada Y; Shiomi H; Nakamura S; Shimamoto S; Teshima T; Inoue T; Inoue T
    Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15062145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attenuation of intracavitary applicators in 192Ir-HDR brachytherapy.
    Ye SJ; Brezovich IA; Shen S; Duan J; Popple RA; Pareek PN
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2097-106. PubMed ID: 15305463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Thermal and scatter effects on the radiation sensitivity of well chambers used for high dose rate Ir-192 calibrations.
    Podgorsak MB; DeWerd LA; Thomadsen BR; Paliwal BR
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1311-4. PubMed ID: 1435615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The IPEM code of practice for determination of the reference air kerma rate for HDR (192)Ir brachytherapy sources based on the NPL air kerma standard.
    Bidmead AM; Sander T; Locks SM; Lee CD; Aird EG; Nutbrown RF; Flynn A;
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3145-59. PubMed ID: 20479510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of directional interstitial sources to improve dosimetry in breast brachytherapy.
    Lin L; Patel RR; Thomadsen BR; Henderson DL
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):240-7. PubMed ID: 18293579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of air kerma standards of LNE-LNHB and NPL for 192Ir HDR brachytherapy sources: EUROMET project no 814.
    Douysset G; Sander T; Gouriou J; Nutbrown R
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):N85-97. PubMed ID: 18367784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A reference air kerma rate calibration protocol for a 370 GBq 192Ir high dose rate brachytherapy source.
    Wallace AB
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Jun; 20(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 9262025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lessons learned from a HDR brachytherapy well ionisation chamber calibration error.
    Dempsey C
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2011 Dec; 34(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 21858526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of ambient humidity on the current delivered by air-vented ionization chambers revisited.
    Poirier A; Douysset G
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4995-5006. PubMed ID: 16985283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A practical implementation of the 2010 IPEM high dose rate brachytherapy code of practice for the calibration of 192Ir sources.
    Awunor OA; Lecomber AR; Richmond N; Walker C
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5397-410. PubMed ID: 21804181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Commissioning of a well type chamber for HDR and LDR brachytherapy applications: a review of methodology and outcomes.
    Mukwada G; Neveri G; Alkhatib Z; Waterhouse DK; Ebert M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Mar; 39(1):167-75. PubMed ID: 26691921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. HDR brachytherapy well chamber calibration and stability evaluated over twenty years of clinical use.
    Keehan S; Smith RL; Butler D
    Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(1):257-264. PubMed ID: 32952051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determination of the reference air kerma rate for 192Ir brachytherapy sources and the related uncertainty.
    van Dijk E; Kolkman-Deurloo IK; Damen PM
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2826-33. PubMed ID: 15543790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Calibration of new high dose rate 192Ir sources.
    Stump KE; Dewerd LA; Micka JA; Anderson DR
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1483-8. PubMed ID: 12148729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of response characteristics of two new reentrant brachytherapy ion chambers.
    Pai S; Reinstein LE; Xu Z; Huang J
    Med Phys; 1999 Apr; 26(4):660-1. PubMed ID: 10227370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.