BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

28 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9608684)

  • 1. A computer simulation analysis of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in estimating genetic relationships: an application to papillomavirus DNA sequences.
    Qiao B; Weigel RM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Jul; 5():102. PubMed ID: 15279682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NIST physical standards for DNA-based medical testing.
    Barker PE; Watson MS; Ticehurst JR; Colbert JC; O'Connell CD
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2002; 16(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 11835524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interlaboratory comparison of autoradiographic DNA profiling measurements. 4. Protocol effects.
    Duewer DL; Currie LA; Reeder DJ; Leigh SD; Filliben JJ; Liu HK; Mudd JL
    Anal Chem; 1997 May; 69(10):1882-92. PubMed ID: 9164161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. RFLP band size standards: cell line K562 values from 1991 to 1997 proficiency studies.
    Duewer DL; Gary KT; Reeder DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Sep; 45(5):1106-18. PubMed ID: 11005188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RFLP band size standards: NIST standard reference material 2390.
    Duewer DL; Richie KL; Reeder DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Sep; 45(5):1093-105. PubMed ID: 11005187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deoxyribonucleic acid profiling by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis--a compilation of validation studies.
    Tahir MA; Caruso JF; Hamby PP; Sovinski SM
    Sci Justice; 1996; 36(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 8789934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Summary of validation studies from twenty-six forensic laboratories in the United States and Canada on the use of the AmpliType PM PCR amplification and typing kit.
    Word CJ; Sawosik TM; Bing DH
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Jan; 42(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 8988573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interlaboratory comparison of autoradiographic DNA profiling measurements: precision and concordance.
    Duewer DL; Lalonde SA; Aubin RA; Fourney RM; Reeder DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 May; 43(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 9608684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
    Augustin JC; Carlier V
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case work guidelines and interpretation of short tandem repeat complex mixture analysis.
    Tomsey CS; Kurtz M; Flowers B; Fumea J; Giles B; Kucherer S
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 11387638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forensic DNA tests.
    Weedn VW
    Clin Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 16(1):187-96. PubMed ID: 8867590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.