89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9609170)
1. Previous breast biopsy for benign disease rarely complicates or alters interpretation on screening mammography.
Slanetz PJ; Giardino AA; McCarthy KA; Hall DA; Halpern EF; Moore RH; Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jun; 170(6):1539-41. PubMed ID: 9609170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic changes after excisional breast biopsy for benign disease.
Brenner RJ; Pfaff JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Oct; 167(4):1047-52. PubMed ID: 8819410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Follow-up recommendations for benign breast biopsies.
Shin S; Schneider HB; Cole FJ; Laronga C
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 16958957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The abnormal mammogram in women with clinically normal breasts.
Sterns EE
Can J Surg; 1995 Apr; 38(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 7728672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: assessment of patient stress.
Lindfors KK; O'Connor J; Acredolo CR; Liston SE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 9648763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of benign breast biopsy on subsequent breast cancer detection practices.
Benedict S; Williams RD; Baron PL
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1994 Oct; 21(9):1467-75. PubMed ID: 7816674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump.
Dennis MA; Parker SH; Klaus AJ; Stavros AT; Kaske TI; Clark SB
Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):186-91. PubMed ID: 11274555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography as a screening tool for peripheral vascular disease.
Dale PS; Graham J; Nichols KW; Catchings T; Richards M
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):488-91. PubMed ID: 16978956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scar formation after stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy of benign breast lesions.
Yazici B; Sever AR; Mills P; Fish D; Jones SE; Jones PA
Clin Radiol; 2006 Jul; 61(7):619-24. PubMed ID: 16784949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of diagnostic work-up with subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program for false-positive cases.
Seigneurin A; Exbrayat C; Labarère J; Delafosse P; Poncet F; Colonna M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 May; 127(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 20809364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy.
Brenner RJ; Fajardo L; Fisher PR; Dershaw DD; Evans WP; Bassett L; Feig S; Mendelson E; Jackson V; Margolin FR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 8553943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Benton CL; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
Cancer; 2003 Jul; 98(2):377-88. PubMed ID: 12872360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography immediately after stereotaxic breast biopsy: is it necessary?
Hann LE; Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Cohen MA; Abramson AF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jul; 165(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 7785633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation.
Robbins J; Jeffries D; Roubidoux M; Helvie M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 21343518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings.
Leung JW; Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 17312052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changing emphasis in breast diagnosis: the surgeon's role in evaluating mammographic abnormalities.
Sterns EE
J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 184(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 9060928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.
Harvey JA; Fajardo LL; Innis CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8249720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
