These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9609854)
1. Anonymity and pseudonymity in whistleblowing to the U.S. Office of Research Integrity. Price AR Acad Med; 1998 May; 73(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 9609854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anonymous poison pen letters vs allegations of scientific misconduct. Price AR Acad Med; 1998 Oct; 73(10):1027-8. PubMed ID: 9795611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond. Pascal CB Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct in US health service. Choo V Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The American experience: lessons learned. Rhoades LJ Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 11273443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct? Lubalin JS; Matheson JL Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):229-50. PubMed ID: 11657861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime. Kline S J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Protti M J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Complainant issues in research misconduct: the office of research integrity experience. Pascal CB Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2006 Jul; 231(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 16816133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The assault on David Baltimore. Kevles DJ New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity. Rennie D BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary on "The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?" (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson). Swazey JP Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 11657862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]