133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9609886)
1. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part I. Prediction with a computer model.
Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):647-55. PubMed ID: 9609886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Estimation of aortic time-enhancement curve in pharmacokinetic analysis: dynamic study by multi-detector row computed tomography].
Yamaguchi I; Hayashi H; Suzuki M; Kidoya E; Higashimura K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jun; 63(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 17625352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of a computer simulated prediction model of contrast enhancement of the liver in spiral CT.
Schöber W; Kopp A; Scherf C; Mehnert F; Heuschmid M; Duda SH; Claussen CD; Pereira P
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jul; 51(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 15186880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation of aortic peak enhancement on MDCT using a contrast material flow phantom: feasibility study.
Awai K; Hatcho A; Nakayama Y; Kusunoki S; Liu D; Hatemura M; Funama Y; Denbo M; Sato N; Yamashita Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 16423942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model.
Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 9609887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of pharmacokinetics to computed tomography: injection rates and schemes: mono-, bi-, or multiphasic?
Krause W
Invest Radiol; 1996 Feb; 31(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 8750444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model.
Bae KT
Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):809-16. PubMed ID: 12702823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hepatic CT enhancement: effect of the rate and volume of contrast medium injection in an animal model.
Garcia P; Genin G; Bret PM; Bonaldi VM; Reinhold C; Atri M
Abdom Imaging; 1999; 24(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 10525816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiphasic injection method for uniform prolonged vascular enhancement at CT angiography: pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
Bae KT; Tran HQ; Heiken JP
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):872-80. PubMed ID: 10966725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model.
Han JK; Kim AY; Lee KY; Seo JB; Kim TK; Choi BI; Lhee CS; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 10864075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effect of Contrast Material on Radiation Dose at CT: Part I. Incorporation of Contrast Material Dynamics in Anthropomorphic Phantoms.
Sahbaee P; Segars WP; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E
Radiology; 2017 Jun; 283(3):739-748. PubMed ID: 28092496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
Heiken JP; Brink JA; McClennan BL; Sagel SS; Forman HP; DiCroce J
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 8475268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling of the contrast-enhanced perfusion test in liver based on the multi-compartment flow in porous media.
Rohan E; Lukeš V; Jonášová A
J Math Biol; 2018 Aug; 77(2):421-454. PubMed ID: 29368273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hepatic enhancement analysis in children using smart prep monitoring for 2 : 1 pitch helical scanning.
Vade A; Olson MC; Vittore CP; Subbaiah P
Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Sep; 29(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 10460331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Parameters influencing hepatic parenchyma enhancement in x-ray computed tomography after intravenous injection of iodinated contrast medium].
Bonaldi VM; Garcia P; Bret PM
J Radiol; 1997 Apr; 78(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 9239358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight.
Awai K; Hiraishi K; Hori S
Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 14695390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
