These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9609887)
1. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 9609887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Bae KT Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):809-16. PubMed ID: 12702823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose. Bae KT; Shah AJ; Shang SS; Wang JH; Chang S; Kanematsu M; Hildebolt CF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1589-94. PubMed ID: 18941106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hepatic CT enhancement: effect of the rate and volume of contrast medium injection in an animal model. Garcia P; Genin G; Bret PM; Bonaldi VM; Reinhold C; Atri M Abdom Imaging; 1999; 24(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 10525816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of cardiac function on aortic peak time and peak enhancement during coronary CT angiography. Sakai S; Yabuuchi H; Chishaki A; Okafuji T; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Setoguchi T; Honda H Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 19442467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times. Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between one-route and two-route injection for liver and aortic enhancement using MDCT. Okada M; Murakami T; Kumano S; Imaoka I; Shimono T; Ashikaga R; Hosono M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W323-6. PubMed ID: 18492873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Awai K; Hiraishi K; Hori S Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 14695390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods. Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paradoxical Effect of Cardiac Output on Arterial Enhancement at Computed Tomography: Does Cardiac Output Reduction Simply Result in an Increase in Aortic Peak Enhancement? Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Funama Y; Shimonobo T; Shirasaka T; Hatemura M; Utsunomiya D; Oda S; Yuki H; Namimoto T; Higaki T; Awai K; Yamashita Y J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(3):349-353. PubMed ID: 28471868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement During Hepatic-Arterial and Portal Venous Phase Computed Tomography Scanning: Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis Using Age, Sex, Total Body Weight, Height, and Cardiac Output. Masuda T; Nakaura T; Funama Y; Higaki T; Kiguchi M; Imada N; Sato T; Awai K J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(2):309-314. PubMed ID: 27759599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic helical CT of the abdomen: prospective comparison of pre- and postprandial contrast enhancement. Sheafor DH; Keogan MT; DeLong DM; Nelson RC Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):359-63. PubMed ID: 9457186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of time to peak contrast enhancement of the aorta and liver for dual-phase computed tomography on the basis of contrast medium arrival time, injection duration, and injection technique in dogs. Chau J; Young AC; Dhand N; Makara MA Am J Vet Res; 2016 Oct; 77(10):1093-100. PubMed ID: 27668580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hepatic contrast enhancement at CT: influence of intravenous glucagon in a canine model. Warshauer DM; Hiken JN; Molina PL; Hackney SL; Bellinger DA; Lee JK Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 7480678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of different threshold levels and injection rates on hepatic enhancement by using bolus tracking technique in helical CT]. Erdoğan C; Savci G Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 14661491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EFFECTS OF TWO CONTRAST INJECTION PROTOCOLS ON FELINE AORTIC AND HEPATIC ENHANCEMENT USING DYNAMIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Makara M; Chau J; Hall E; Kloeppel H; Podadera J; Barrs V Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 25640846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gadolinium as a CT contrast agent: assessment in a porcine model. Gierada DS; Bae KT Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):829-34. PubMed ID: 10207488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model. Han JK; Kim AY; Lee KY; Seo JB; Kim TK; Choi BI; Lhee CS; Han MC J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 10864075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]