These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9609887)

  • 41. Application of pharmacokinetics to computed tomography: injection rates and schemes: mono-, bi-, or multiphasic?
    Krause W
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Feb; 31(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 8750444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hepatic enhancement analysis in children using smart prep monitoring for 2 : 1 pitch helical scanning.
    Vade A; Olson MC; Vittore CP; Subbaiah P
    Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Sep; 29(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 10460331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dynamic CT scanning of the normal canine liver: interpretation of time density curves resulting from an intravenous bolus injection of contrast material.
    Jaschke W; Lipton MJ; Boyd D; Moss AA; Cann C; Goldberg HI; Margulis AR; Sievers R
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Nov; 5(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 2935396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement.
    Heiken JP; Brink JA; McClennan BL; Sagel SS; Crowe TM; Gaines MV
    Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):353-7. PubMed ID: 7724752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of the use of a saline chaser to reduce the volume of contrast medium in abdominal CT.
    Orlandini F; Boini S; Iochum-Duchamps S; Batch T; Zhu X; Blum A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):511-5. PubMed ID: 16861557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT.
    Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Tsuda K; Tomoda K; Narumi Y; Oi H; Nakamura H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 9694469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. CTA contrast enhancement of the aorta and pulmonary artery: the effect of saline chase injected at two different rates in a canine experimental model.
    Lee CH; Goo JM; Bae KT; Lee HJ; Kim KG; Chun EJ; Park CM; Im JG
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):486-90. PubMed ID: 17568270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of A New Bolus Tracking-Based Algorithm for Predicting A Patient-Specific Time of Arterial Peak Enhancement in Computed Tomography Angiography.
    Korporaal JG; Bischoff B; Arnoldi E; Sommer WH; Flohr TG; Schmidt B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 25900084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparison between injection speed and iodine delivery rate in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for normal beagles.
    Tateishi K; Kishimoto M; Shimizu J; Yamada K
    J Vet Med Sci; 2008 Oct; 70(10):1027-30. PubMed ID: 18981656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dynamic computed tomography to determine cardiac output in patients with left ventricular assist devices.
    Raman SV; Tran T; Simonetti OP; Sun B
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1213-7. PubMed ID: 19379994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Parameters influencing hepatic parenchyma enhancement in x-ray computed tomography after intravenous injection of iodinated contrast medium].
    Bonaldi VM; Garcia P; Bret PM
    J Radiol; 1997 Apr; 78(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 9239358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Hepatic CT enhancement. Part II. Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients.
    Chambers TP; Baron RL; Lush RM
    Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):518-22. PubMed ID: 7972771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analysis of contrast time-enhancement curves to optimise CT pulmonary angiography.
    Zhu J; Wang Z; Kim Y; Bae SK; Tao C; Gong J; Bae KT
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Apr; 72(4):340.e9-340.e16. PubMed ID: 28027777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Operation of bolus tracking system for prediction of aortic peak enhancement at multidetector row computed tomography: pharmacokinetic analysis and clinical study.
    Yamaguchi I; Hayashi H; Suzuki M; Ichikawa K; Kidoya E; Kimura H
    Radiat Med; 2008 Jun; 26(5):278-86. PubMed ID: 18661212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of injection time on time to peak hepatic enhancement.
    Irie T; Kusano S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(4):633-7. PubMed ID: 8708070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Contrast timing in computed tomography: effect of different contrast media concentrations on bolus geometry.
    Mahnken AH; Jost G; Seidensticker P; Kuhl C; Pietsch H
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e629-32. PubMed ID: 22297184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Determining the optimal timing for early arterial phase hepatic CT imaging by measuring abdominal aortic enhancement in variable contrast injection protocols.
    Murakami T; Onishi H; Mikami K; Iannaccone R; Federle MP; Kim T; Hori M; Okada A; Marukawa T; Higashihara H; Passariello R; Nakamura H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16628033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of contrast injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight and fixed injection duration on aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector-row helical CT.
    Awai K; Hori S
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Sep; 13(9):2155-60. PubMed ID: 12736754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material.
    Brink JA; Heiken JP; Forman HP; Sagel SS; Molina PL; Brown PC
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 7568859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Contrast material administration protocols for 64-MDCT angiography: altering volume and rate and use of a saline chaser to better match the imaging window--physiologic phantom study.
    Coursey CA; Nelson RC; Weber PW; Howle LE; Nichols EB; Marin D; DeLong D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1568-75. PubMed ID: 19933649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.