These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Novel popout with nonsense strings: effects of predictability of string length and spatial location. Hawley KJ; Johnston WA; Farnham JM Percept Psychophys; 1994 Mar; 55(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 8036107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel popout is an attention-based phenomenon: an ERP analysis. Strayer DL; Johnston WA Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):459-70. PubMed ID: 10909237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis. Krueger LE Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention. Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kouchi S; Lachter J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):973-88. PubMed ID: 20436194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Context effects in visual word recognition: lexical relatedness and syntactic context. Schriefers H; Friederici AD; Rose U Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1292-303. PubMed ID: 9847552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition: the effects of inter-item lag. Nagy ME; Rugg MD Psychophysiology; 1989 Jul; 26(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 2798692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semantic and Syntactic Associations During Word Search Modulate the Relationship Between Attention and Subsequent Memory. Zhou W; Mo F; Zhang Y; Ding J J Gen Psychol; 2017; 144(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 28098521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal variability of the N2pc during efficient and inefficient visual search. Dowdall JR; Luczak A; Tata MS Neuropsychologia; 2012 Aug; 50(10):2442-53. PubMed ID: 22743179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Familiarity seekers are fast and novelty seekers are slow. Christie J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):312-25. PubMed ID: 16618636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Word associations are formed incidentally during sentential semantic integration. Prior A; Bentin S Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 17367741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks. Inhoff AW; Briihl D; Schwartz J Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):466-76. PubMed ID: 8757495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of stimulus repetition on cortical magnetic responses evoked by words and nonwords. Sekiguchi T; Koyama S; Kakigi R Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):118-28. PubMed ID: 11525321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval. Vitkovitch M; Cooper E Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Van Petten C; Kutas M Mem Cognit; 1990 Jul; 18(4):380-93. PubMed ID: 2381317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming. Malley GB; Strayer DL Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jul; 57(5):657-67. PubMed ID: 7644326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A developmental evaluation of the role of word shape in word recognition. Healy AF; Cunningham TF Mem Cognit; 1992 Mar; 20(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 1565012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]