155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9610124)
1. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.
Schreiber TA
Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 9610124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relation between feelings of knowing and the number of neighboring concepts linked to the test cue.
Schreiber TA; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):869-83. PubMed ID: 9796223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recalled aspects of original encoding strategies influence episodic feelings of knowing.
Hertzog C; Fulton EK; Sinclair SM; Dunlosky J
Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):126-40. PubMed ID: 23835601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Divided attention at encoding: effect on feeling-of-knowing.
Sacher M; Taconnat L; Souchay C; Isingrini M
Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):754-61. PubMed ID: 19423362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age invariance in feeling of knowing during implicit interference effects.
Eakin DK; Hertzog C
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Sep; 67(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 22367709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: set size and word-frequency effects.
Nelson DL; Xu J
Psychol Res; 1995; 57(3-4):203-14. PubMed ID: 7753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sentence encoding and implicitly activated memories.
Nelson DL; Gee NR; Schreiber TA
Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):643-54. PubMed ID: 1435267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential effects in lexical decision: tests of compound-cue retrieval theory.
Ratcliff R; McKoon G
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1380-8. PubMed ID: 8744970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.
Nelson DL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 4096333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.
Schwartz BL; Metcalfe J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):1074-83. PubMed ID: 1402711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Context effects in recall and recognition at various retention intervals.
Culross RR
Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1216-8. PubMed ID: 1501990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Induction of a memory retrieval strategy by young children.
Ackerman BP
J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Jul; 62(2):243-71. PubMed ID: 8683188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accessing the particular from the general: the power of distinctiveness in the context of organization.
Hunt RR; Smith RE
Mem Cognit; 1996 Mar; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 8881324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implicit processing in the cued recall of young and old adults.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL; Holley PE; Stelnicki GS
Psychol Aging; 1992 Sep; 7(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 1388861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
