These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9610124)

  • 41. The use of cue familiarity during retrieval failure is affected by past versus future orientation.
    Cleary AM
    Memory; 2015; 23(4):590-601. PubMed ID: 24786966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
    McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dissociative effects in different prime domains.
    Nelson DL; LaLomia MJ; Canas JJ
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):44-62. PubMed ID: 2017029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Are independent probes truly independent?
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 19586262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited.
    Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 11958356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI; Hansen JS; Pallos AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):861-70. PubMed ID: 14516219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Monitoring processes and metamemory experience in patients with dysexecutive syndrome.
    Pinon K; Allain P; Kefi MZ; Dubas F; Le Gall D
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 15708214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Memory in multiple sclerosis: contextual encoding deficits.
    Thornton AE; Raz N; Tucke KA
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2002 Mar; 8(3):395-409. PubMed ID: 11939698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.
    Nelson DL; Dyrdal GM; Goodmon LB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):711-9. PubMed ID: 16447386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Recall and reproduction of words: age-dependent activation of context information in recalling episodic memory contents].
    Hasselhorn M; Hager W; Cienciala D
    Z Gerontol; 1989; 22(6):298-307. PubMed ID: 2623931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On predicting the future states of awareness for recognition of unrecallable items.
    Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 11958355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Episodic feeling-of-knowing accuracy and cued recall in the elderly: evidence for double dissociation involving executive functioning and processing speed.
    Perrotin A; Isingrini M; Souchay C; Clarys D; Taconnat L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):58-73. PubMed ID: 16309619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Revelation effect in metamemory.
    Young KD; Peynircioğlu ZF; Hohman TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):952-6. PubMed ID: 19815804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Metamemory in a familiar place: The effects of environmental context on feeling of knowing.
    Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K; Collie H; Macken B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 27280853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Priming and cued recall in elderly, alcohol intoxicated and sleep deprived subjects: a case of functionally similar memory deficits.
    Nilsson LG; Bäckman L; Karlsson T
    Psychol Med; 1989 May; 19(2):423-33. PubMed ID: 2762444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Practicing more retrieval routes leads to greater memory retention.
    Zheng J; Zhang W; Li T; Liu Z; Luo L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():109-18. PubMed ID: 27270228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.
    Koriat A
    Psychol Rev; 1993 Oct; 100(4):609-39. PubMed ID: 8255951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.
    Poirier M; Nairne JS; Morin C; Zimmermann FG; Koutmeridou K; Fowler J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21823814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.