These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9610321)

  • 1. The effect of alcoholic and nonalcoholic mouthwashes on heat-treated composite resin.
    Weiner R; Millstein P; Hoang E; Marshall D
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(6):249-53. PubMed ID: 9610321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alcohol-containing mouthwashes: effect on composite hardness.
    Penugonda B; Settembrini L; Scherer W; Hittelman E; Strassler H
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(2):60-2. PubMed ID: 7999290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alcohol-containing mouthwasheses: effect on composite color.
    Settembrini L; Penugonda B; Scherer W; Strassler H; Hittelman E
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 8700761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of three different mouthrinses on the surface hardness, gloss and colour change of bleached nano composite resins.
    Gurgan S; Yalcin Cakir F
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Sep; 16(3):104-8. PubMed ID: 19051551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro effects of alcohol-containing and alcohol-free mouthrinses on microhardness of some restorative materials.
    Gürgan S; Onen A; Köprülü H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 9131482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of mouthrinses on microhardness and wear of composite and compomer restoratives.
    Yap AU; Tan BW; Tay LC; Chang KM; Loy TK; Mok BY
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 14653289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of different solutions on the surface hardness of composite resin materials.
    Yanikoğlu N; Duymuş ZY; Yilmaz B
    Dent Mater J; 2009 May; 28(3):344-51. PubMed ID: 19662734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of selected mouthwashes with and without toothbrushing on the surface hardness of a resin modified glass-ionomer and two compomers.
    Sadaghiani L; Wilson MA; Wilson NH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Sep; 15(3):98-103. PubMed ID: 17970315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shock absorbability and hardness of commercially available denture teeth.
    Kawano F; Ohguri T; Ichikawa T; Mizuno I; Hasegawa A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 12066486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface Hardness of Dental Composite Resin Restorations in Response to Preventive Agents.
    Al-Samadani KH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):978-984. PubMed ID: 27965483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power distribution across the face of different light guides and its effect on composite surface microhardness.
    Vandewalle KS; Roberts HW; Rueggeberg FA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):108-17; discussion 118. PubMed ID: 18380841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of pre-heating on depth of cure and surface hardness of light-polymerized resin composites.
    Muñoz CA; Bond PR; Sy-Muñoz J; Tan D; Peterson J
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 18795516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of curing tip distance on resin composite Knoop hardness number, using three different light curing units.
    Caldas DB; de Almeida JB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA; Consani S
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 12760705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-link density evaluation through softening tests: effect of ethanol concentration.
    Schneider LF; Moraes RR; Cavalcante LM; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani S
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 17544496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hardness and diametral tensile strength of a hybrid composite resin polymerized with different modes and immersed in ethanol or distilled water media.
    Aguiar FH; Braceiro AT; Ambrosano GM; Lovadino JR
    Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1098-103. PubMed ID: 15921735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of different exposure time required to stabilize hardness values of composite resin restorations.
    Cavalcante LM; Valentino TA; Carlini B; Silikas N; Pimenta LA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):42-50. PubMed ID: 19279971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite.
    Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 12473997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of bleaching on subsurface micro-hardness of composite and a polyacid modified composite.
    Hannig C; Duong S; Becker K; Brunner E; Kahler E; Attin T
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 16546248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites.
    Beyth N; Bahir R; Matalon S; Domb AJ; Weiss EI
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 17897707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of two silane coupling agents, a bonding agent, and thermal cycling on the bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite material cemented with two resin luting agents.
    Yoshida K; Kamada K; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 11208209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.