These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9610854)

  • 1. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Stratis S; Bryant RW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 25(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 9610854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the margin region of amalgam restorations: a simulated clinical study.
    Bryant RW
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1992; 6():39-45. PubMed ID: 1300132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations.
    Bryant RW; Collins CJ
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finishing of amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Collins CJ; Bryant RW
    J Dent; 1992 Aug; 20(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 1430508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finishing techniques for amalgam restorations: clinical assessment at three years.
    Bryant RW; Collins CJ
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Oct; 37(5):333-9. PubMed ID: 1444953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cavity design and marginal degradation of the occlusal part of Class-II amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):389-97. PubMed ID: 2288211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal integrity of amalgam restorations.
    Leidal TI; Dahl JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1980; 38(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 6929645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures.
    Ferreira Rde S; Lopes GC; Baratieri LN
    Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 15130074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Experimental research on the finishing and polishing of amalgam fillings].
    Staehle HJ; Rummler A
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 1866610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 1410252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finishing of amalgam restorations: to what degree is it necessary?
    Jeffrey IW; Pitts NB
    J Dent; 1989 Apr; 17(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 2732365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.