159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9610858)
1. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics.
Teixeira ER; Sato Y; Akagawa Y; Shindoi N
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 25(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 9610858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.
Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micro finite element analysis of dental implants under different loading conditions.
Marcián P; Wolff J; Horáčková L; Kaiser J; Zikmund T; Borák L
Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():157-165. PubMed ID: 29587150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant.
Geng JP; Xu DW; Tan KB; Liu GR
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 15453222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.
Mosavar A; Ziaei A; Kadkhodaei M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1317-26. PubMed ID: 26478976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress and strain analysis of the bone-implant interface: a comparison of fiber-reinforced composite and titanium implants utilizing 3-dimensional finite element study.
Shinya A; Ballo AM; Lassila LV; Shinya A; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():133-40. PubMed ID: 20545537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of implant number and position on the stress behavior of mandibular implant retained overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Topkaya T; Solmaz MY
J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):2102-9. PubMed ID: 25862522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs.
Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress distribution and micromotion analyses of immediately loaded implants of varying lengths in the mandible and fibular bone grafts: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Wu JC; Chen CS; Yip SW; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e77-84. PubMed ID: 23057046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses.
van Zyl PP; Grundling NL; Jooste CH; Terblanche E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 7615317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
