These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9610858)

  • 21. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finite element analysis of post dental implant fixation in drilled mandible sites.
    Pirjamalineisiani A; Sarafbidabad M; Jamshidi N; Esfahani FA
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Feb; 81():159-166. PubMed ID: 28063377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
    Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of 1-piece superstructure on mandibular flexure.
    Naini RB; Nokar S
    Implant Dent; 2009 Oct; 18(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 22129961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Contact Finite Element Analysis of Mandibular All-on-4 Design.
    Hussein MO; Rabie ME
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Apr; 41(2):e12-8. PubMed ID: 24032471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stress in bone adjacent to dental implants.
    Murphy WM; Williams KR; Gregory MC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Dec; 22(12):897-903. PubMed ID: 9217301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three dimensional finite element analysis of a novel osteointegrated dental implant designed to reduce stress peak of cortical bone.
    Zheng L; Yang J; Hu X; Luo J
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2014; 16(3):21-8. PubMed ID: 25307871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical factors associated with mandibular cantilevers: analysis with three-dimensional finite element models.
    Gonda T; Yasuda D; Ikebe K; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):e275-82. PubMed ID: 25397809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experimental and finite element study of a human mandible.
    Vollmer D; Meyer U; Joos U; Vègh A; Piffko J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 28(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 10958421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cortical bone stress distribution in mandibles with different configurations restored with prefabricated bar-prosthesis protocol: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Assunção WG; Júnior AC; Anchieta RB
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 21087340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effectiveness of element downsizing on a three-dimensional finite element model of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanics.
    Sato Y; Wadamoto M; Tsuga K; Teixeira ER
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Apr; 26(4):288-91. PubMed ID: 10232856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.